Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker - Your decision to end business in "Occupied Palestinian Territory" is based on what you perceive to be the notion that "a majority of the international community, including the United Nations, deems to be an illegal occupation." But this premise is patently inaccurate since it relies on non-obligatory UN General Assembly resolutions adopted by an automatic and political majority that cannot claim to determine the legality or illegality of Israel's presence in the territory. Your decision ignores the fact that the Palestinians themselves and Israel have agreed in the internationally-sanctioned Oslo Accords to divide the governance of the territories between them, pending completion of their mutual negotiation on the permanent status of the territories. Thus, your reasoning for ending business in these areas is based on a false premise and runs counter to the Palestinians' own wishes and legal obligations in the Oslo Accords. The writer, former legal counsel to Israel's foreign ministry and former ambassador to Canada, heads the international law program at the Jerusalem Center.2021-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
An Open Letter to the Board of Directors of Ben and Jerry's
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker - Your decision to end business in "Occupied Palestinian Territory" is based on what you perceive to be the notion that "a majority of the international community, including the United Nations, deems to be an illegal occupation." But this premise is patently inaccurate since it relies on non-obligatory UN General Assembly resolutions adopted by an automatic and political majority that cannot claim to determine the legality or illegality of Israel's presence in the territory. Your decision ignores the fact that the Palestinians themselves and Israel have agreed in the internationally-sanctioned Oslo Accords to divide the governance of the territories between them, pending completion of their mutual negotiation on the permanent status of the territories. Thus, your reasoning for ending business in these areas is based on a false premise and runs counter to the Palestinians' own wishes and legal obligations in the Oslo Accords. The writer, former legal counsel to Israel's foreign ministry and former ambassador to Canada, heads the international law program at the Jerusalem Center.2021-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|