Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(CAMERA-UK) Adam Levick - The Guardian on July 23 claimed that the Israeli community of Efrat, 20 km. south of Jerusalem, was located on land that once belonged to four Palestinian villages. In fact, the town, which today has 11,500 residents, is built on land predominantly owned and populated by Jews since decades prior to 1948. Gush Etzion (the Etzion Bloc) has been recognized in past Israeli-Palestinian negotiations as an area that would remain part of Israel in any future peace agreement. Mayor Oded Revivi confirmed that Efrat was built on state land and some private Jewish land. When it was declared state land by Israeli authorities in the 1970s, this was based on a thorough review of land registries during Ottoman, British and Jordanian control of the territory. Revivi stressed that when the town was built, they were extremely careful to avoid building on any private Palestinian land. When the founders of the community discovered some small parcels that, the records showed, did belong to Palestinians, they were careful to build around it. As the town is not surrounded by a fence, the small amount of privately owned land is accessible to the Palestinian owners. He added that there haven't been any legal claims in decades. Thus, the construction of Efrat didn't involve the illegal seizure of private Palestinian land, and it didn't involve the displacement of any Palestinians or the destruction of any Palestinian homes.2021-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
Guardian Falsely Claims Israeli Town Was Built on Palestinian Land
(CAMERA-UK) Adam Levick - The Guardian on July 23 claimed that the Israeli community of Efrat, 20 km. south of Jerusalem, was located on land that once belonged to four Palestinian villages. In fact, the town, which today has 11,500 residents, is built on land predominantly owned and populated by Jews since decades prior to 1948. Gush Etzion (the Etzion Bloc) has been recognized in past Israeli-Palestinian negotiations as an area that would remain part of Israel in any future peace agreement. Mayor Oded Revivi confirmed that Efrat was built on state land and some private Jewish land. When it was declared state land by Israeli authorities in the 1970s, this was based on a thorough review of land registries during Ottoman, British and Jordanian control of the territory. Revivi stressed that when the town was built, they were extremely careful to avoid building on any private Palestinian land. When the founders of the community discovered some small parcels that, the records showed, did belong to Palestinians, they were careful to build around it. As the town is not surrounded by a fence, the small amount of privately owned land is accessible to the Palestinian owners. He added that there haven't been any legal claims in decades. Thus, the construction of Efrat didn't involve the illegal seizure of private Palestinian land, and it didn't involve the displacement of any Palestinians or the destruction of any Palestinian homes.2021-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|