Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) David E. Sanger - Iranian Foreign Minister Hossain Amirabdollahian said Friday that in return for agreeing to limits on its nuclear program, his country would demand far more sanctions relief than it received under the 2015 nuclear deal, pointing to a looming impasse with the U.S. Moreover, Amirabdollahian told the New York Times on Thursday, "We will not have a so-called 'longer and stronger' deal," as U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has suggested. Amirabdollahian's rejection of any tougher or extended nuclear agreement signaled that Iran intends to preserve the time frame of the 2015 agreement, with restrictions on nuclear fuel largely expiring in 2030. There is increasing concern in the West that a duration that seemed long enough in 2015 looks disturbingly short in 2021. Inside the White House and the State Department, there is now an expectation that the Iran nuclear talks could spill into next year, and could collapse entirely. 2021-09-27 00:00:00Full Article
Iran to Demand Higher Price for Limiting Nuclear Program than in 2015
(New York Times) David E. Sanger - Iranian Foreign Minister Hossain Amirabdollahian said Friday that in return for agreeing to limits on its nuclear program, his country would demand far more sanctions relief than it received under the 2015 nuclear deal, pointing to a looming impasse with the U.S. Moreover, Amirabdollahian told the New York Times on Thursday, "We will not have a so-called 'longer and stronger' deal," as U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has suggested. Amirabdollahian's rejection of any tougher or extended nuclear agreement signaled that Iran intends to preserve the time frame of the 2015 agreement, with restrictions on nuclear fuel largely expiring in 2030. There is increasing concern in the West that a duration that seemed long enough in 2015 looks disturbingly short in 2021. Inside the White House and the State Department, there is now an expectation that the Iran nuclear talks could spill into next year, and could collapse entirely. 2021-09-27 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|