Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Washington Post] Peter Baker and Robin Wright - Deliberations at the UN over a cease-fire in Lebanon have become tangled in a dispute between the U.S. and France over the right approach. President Bush insisted that any cease-fire plan establish Lebanese control over its territory, dispatch a multinational force to create a buffer zone, and require Iran and Syria to stop backing Hizballah, which is firing rockets at Israeli territory. Yet a meeting to craft plans for the international force was postponed after France declared it pointless without a political settlement between Israel and Lebanon. The resolution drafted by the U.S. would include terms for a cease-fire, outline a set of political principles for a long-term settlement of regional tensions, and define a mandate for the international force. The force would back up the Lebanese army as it asserts authority in regions now controlled by Hizballah and block import of new weapons for the militia. All armed groups would be prohibited in the zone where the international force is deployed. 2006-08-01 01:00:00Full Article
UN Talks Stall on Lebanon Cease-Fire Terms
[Washington Post] Peter Baker and Robin Wright - Deliberations at the UN over a cease-fire in Lebanon have become tangled in a dispute between the U.S. and France over the right approach. President Bush insisted that any cease-fire plan establish Lebanese control over its territory, dispatch a multinational force to create a buffer zone, and require Iran and Syria to stop backing Hizballah, which is firing rockets at Israeli territory. Yet a meeting to craft plans for the international force was postponed after France declared it pointless without a political settlement between Israel and Lebanon. The resolution drafted by the U.S. would include terms for a cease-fire, outline a set of political principles for a long-term settlement of regional tensions, and define a mandate for the international force. The force would back up the Lebanese army as it asserts authority in regions now controlled by Hizballah and block import of new weapons for the militia. All armed groups would be prohibited in the zone where the international force is deployed. 2006-08-01 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|