Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Affairs) Michael Singh - Iran has made impossible demands in the negotiations to revive the nuclear deal, reportedly seeking sanctions relief beyond that provided in the JCPOA, while hesitating to commit to rolling back the nuclear activities it has undertaken in violation of that agreement. By developing a credible Plan B that sharpens the consequences for Iran should it continue to rebuff diplomatic overtures and expand its nuclear activities, President Biden may be able to change Iranian leaders' calculus. The central lesson from past diplomatic engagements with Iran is that the U.S. has achieved the most when it has employed several policy tools in conjunction with one another and acted in concert with key partners. First and foremost, the U.S. must demonstrate that Iran will face consequences for the unreasonable stance it has taken at the Vienna talks. The administration should enforce and expand existing economic sanctions in order to disabuse Iranian officials of any notion that sanctions will simply be permitted to weaken or lapse in the absence of a deal. The writer, Managing Director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, served as Senior Director for Middle East Affairs on the U.S. National Security Council.2021-10-28 00:00:00Full Article
Washington Needs to Turn Up the Pressure on Tehran
(Foreign Affairs) Michael Singh - Iran has made impossible demands in the negotiations to revive the nuclear deal, reportedly seeking sanctions relief beyond that provided in the JCPOA, while hesitating to commit to rolling back the nuclear activities it has undertaken in violation of that agreement. By developing a credible Plan B that sharpens the consequences for Iran should it continue to rebuff diplomatic overtures and expand its nuclear activities, President Biden may be able to change Iranian leaders' calculus. The central lesson from past diplomatic engagements with Iran is that the U.S. has achieved the most when it has employed several policy tools in conjunction with one another and acted in concert with key partners. First and foremost, the U.S. must demonstrate that Iran will face consequences for the unreasonable stance it has taken at the Vienna talks. The administration should enforce and expand existing economic sanctions in order to disabuse Iranian officials of any notion that sanctions will simply be permitted to weaken or lapse in the absence of a deal. The writer, Managing Director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, served as Senior Director for Middle East Affairs on the U.S. National Security Council.2021-10-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|