Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker and Lea Bilke - While the Palestinians claim that according to the law and UN Resolution 181, Jerusalem is international territory, this claim has absolutely no basis. Resolution 181, commonly known as the UN Partition Plan, recommended that Jerusalem would be a special international entity, called a corpus separatum, with an international administration under the auspices of the UN. But as with all General Assembly resolutions, which cannot determine legal obligations, Resolution 181 was nothing more than a non-binding recommendation. Moreover, the Arab population and the neighboring Arab/Muslim states forcefully rejected the resolution. In addition, the UN failed to adopt any proposal giving it the legal responsibility for Jerusalem as the General Assembly had envisioned. Thus, Jerusalem has never been determined to be international territory. Alan Baker, former legal counsel to Israel's foreign ministry, heads the international law program at the Jerusalem Center. Lea Bilke is a law student at the Free University of Berlin in Germany, specializing in international and European law. 2021-11-11 00:00:00Full Article
Refuting Palestinian Claims about the U.S. Jerusalem Consulate Issue
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Amb. Alan Baker and Lea Bilke - While the Palestinians claim that according to the law and UN Resolution 181, Jerusalem is international territory, this claim has absolutely no basis. Resolution 181, commonly known as the UN Partition Plan, recommended that Jerusalem would be a special international entity, called a corpus separatum, with an international administration under the auspices of the UN. But as with all General Assembly resolutions, which cannot determine legal obligations, Resolution 181 was nothing more than a non-binding recommendation. Moreover, the Arab population and the neighboring Arab/Muslim states forcefully rejected the resolution. In addition, the UN failed to adopt any proposal giving it the legal responsibility for Jerusalem as the General Assembly had envisioned. Thus, Jerusalem has never been determined to be international territory. Alan Baker, former legal counsel to Israel's foreign ministry, heads the international law program at the Jerusalem Center. Lea Bilke is a law student at the Free University of Berlin in Germany, specializing in international and European law. 2021-11-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|