Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Arab News-Saudi Arabia] Shlomo Avineri - Looking back at 60 years of American involvement in the region, one can discern two scenarios in which the U.S. can bring the local players to an agreement. Absent these conditions, the U.S. is ultimately powerless. The first scenario is when a real war threatens to spill over into a wider conflict. At such times, resolute American steps can stop the fighting and impose a cease-fire. The other scenario is when the two sides have already engaged in bilateral peace talks and reached agreement on most issues. In such cases, America can step in and, by using both carrot and stick, make both sides go the extra mile. When either of these two scenarios is lacking, American initiatives are stillborn. The U.S. is extremely successful as a fire brigade or as a midwife, but not as an initiator. At the end of the day, the key is in the hands of the local players. No national conflict has ever been solved by outside powers, however well intentioned they may be. The writer, professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, served as director-general of Israel's Foreign Ministry. 2008-05-20 01:00:00Full Article
Don't Depend on Outsiders for a Settlement of Mideast Dispute
[Arab News-Saudi Arabia] Shlomo Avineri - Looking back at 60 years of American involvement in the region, one can discern two scenarios in which the U.S. can bring the local players to an agreement. Absent these conditions, the U.S. is ultimately powerless. The first scenario is when a real war threatens to spill over into a wider conflict. At such times, resolute American steps can stop the fighting and impose a cease-fire. The other scenario is when the two sides have already engaged in bilateral peace talks and reached agreement on most issues. In such cases, America can step in and, by using both carrot and stick, make both sides go the extra mile. When either of these two scenarios is lacking, American initiatives are stillborn. The U.S. is extremely successful as a fire brigade or as a midwife, but not as an initiator. At the end of the day, the key is in the hands of the local players. No national conflict has ever been solved by outside powers, however well intentioned they may be. The writer, professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, served as director-general of Israel's Foreign Ministry. 2008-05-20 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|