Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Review) Jack Wolfsohn - Israeli communities near Gaza had been locked down since Aug. 2 as Palestinian Islamic Jihad prepared to fire anti-tank missiles at Israelis near the border, when Israel launched a preemptive strike against PIJ terrorists on Aug. 5. Many media outlets put their usual anti-Israel spin on the story. The Associated Press ran a headline reading, "Israeli strikes on Gaza kill 10, including senior militant." The word "terrorism" is not mentioned once in the story. AP uses the euphemistic term "militants" to describe Islamic Jihad, also omitting the word "Palestinian" from the name. The AP also refers to Hamas, the terrorist group that runs Gaza, as "militant," although both groups are designated as terrorist groups by the U.S. government. The New York Times ran a headline that omitted any mention of Palestinian rockets, saying, "Israel Strikes Gaza as Tensions Rise." The article mentions the rockets in the second sentence of the subheading, saying, "Militants responded with a volley of rockets into Israel." The Times makes the 1,100-rocket barrage launched at Israeli civilians sound like a game. The fact that the media routinely view Israel's conflict with its terrorist neighbors through a lens that finds a moral equivalence between both sides is not only bad journalism, it's morally repugnant. 2022-08-11 00:00:00Full Article
Media Put Anti-Israel Spin on Gaza Fighting
(National Review) Jack Wolfsohn - Israeli communities near Gaza had been locked down since Aug. 2 as Palestinian Islamic Jihad prepared to fire anti-tank missiles at Israelis near the border, when Israel launched a preemptive strike against PIJ terrorists on Aug. 5. Many media outlets put their usual anti-Israel spin on the story. The Associated Press ran a headline reading, "Israeli strikes on Gaza kill 10, including senior militant." The word "terrorism" is not mentioned once in the story. AP uses the euphemistic term "militants" to describe Islamic Jihad, also omitting the word "Palestinian" from the name. The AP also refers to Hamas, the terrorist group that runs Gaza, as "militant," although both groups are designated as terrorist groups by the U.S. government. The New York Times ran a headline that omitted any mention of Palestinian rockets, saying, "Israel Strikes Gaza as Tensions Rise." The article mentions the rockets in the second sentence of the subheading, saying, "Militants responded with a volley of rockets into Israel." The Times makes the 1,100-rocket barrage launched at Israeli civilians sound like a game. The fact that the media routinely view Israel's conflict with its terrorist neighbors through a lens that finds a moral equivalence between both sides is not only bad journalism, it's morally repugnant. 2022-08-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|