Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Gatestone Institute) Alan M. Dershowitz - It is important to continue to support Israel even if one disagrees with some policies of a particular government. One's support for Israel should not vary with whether one agrees or disagrees with the outcome of a particular election, any more than one's support for the U.S. depends on whether Democrats or Republican are in control. Being a Zionist means that one strongly believes in the concept of a secure and democratic nation-state for the Jewish people. One can continue to support the security of Israel against external enemies such as Iran, as well as terrorists such as Hamas and Hizbullah. One can continue to invest in its economy. And one can continue to defend it on campuses against false accusations. One need not threaten to abandon Israel if the Israeli government adopts policies with which one strongly disagrees. As then-President Bill Clinton once complained: "Israel is a democracy, damn it!" His point was that he could simply call the leader of a non-democratic ally and tell him what do. He could not do that to Israel, where the citizens decide what their government should do. Look at the big picture: no country has contributed more to the world in its first three quarters of a century than has Israel; no country faced with dangers comparable to those faced by Israel has had a better record of human rights, compliance with the rule of law and concern for enemy civilians than Israel. Support for the only democracy in the Middle East should remain constant. The writer is Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School. 2022-12-15 00:00:00Full Article
Democracy at Work: Supporting Israel Regardless of Its Government
(Gatestone Institute) Alan M. Dershowitz - It is important to continue to support Israel even if one disagrees with some policies of a particular government. One's support for Israel should not vary with whether one agrees or disagrees with the outcome of a particular election, any more than one's support for the U.S. depends on whether Democrats or Republican are in control. Being a Zionist means that one strongly believes in the concept of a secure and democratic nation-state for the Jewish people. One can continue to support the security of Israel against external enemies such as Iran, as well as terrorists such as Hamas and Hizbullah. One can continue to invest in its economy. And one can continue to defend it on campuses against false accusations. One need not threaten to abandon Israel if the Israeli government adopts policies with which one strongly disagrees. As then-President Bill Clinton once complained: "Israel is a democracy, damn it!" His point was that he could simply call the leader of a non-democratic ally and tell him what do. He could not do that to Israel, where the citizens decide what their government should do. Look at the big picture: no country has contributed more to the world in its first three quarters of a century than has Israel; no country faced with dangers comparable to those faced by Israel has had a better record of human rights, compliance with the rule of law and concern for enemy civilians than Israel. Support for the only democracy in the Middle East should remain constant. The writer is Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School. 2022-12-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|