Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Alan Baker - As part of the annual three-month "Israel-bashing" festival at the UN General Assembly, on 7 December 2022, 146 states adopted one of the annual resolutions calling upon Israel to renounce possession of nuclear weapons and to place its nuclear facilities under international supervision. Substantively and legally speaking, such resolutions, like all General Assembly resolutions, have no binding legal authority and represent nothing more than the collective, partisan political viewpoint of the automatic majority of states that regularly vote against Israel, no matter what the subject. The resolution was sponsored by the Palestinians together with 20 Arab and African countries, including Israel's allies in the Middle East such as Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan and the UAE. It merely copies the eight previous identical resolutions that have been adopted every year since 2015. Some of the most extreme and fanatical states such as Iran and Syria are parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968. The extent to which such states openly violate their NPT obligations, and persistently threaten Israel, is indicative of the inherent weakness and lack of reliability of the supervision system. Hence, Israel insists on the prior establishment and maintenance of stable regional security conditions. Without such a regional framework, Israel is not prepared to commit itself to the obligations of the NPT while other regional powers maintain a state of war with Israel and constantly threaten Israel's very existence, even while being parties to the NPT. The writer served as the legal advisor to Israel's Foreign Ministry and as Israel's ambassador to Canada.2022-12-15 00:00:00Full Article
The Annual UN General Assembly Resolution Calling on Israel to Give Up Nuclear Weapons - "Much Ado about Nothing"
(Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs) Alan Baker - As part of the annual three-month "Israel-bashing" festival at the UN General Assembly, on 7 December 2022, 146 states adopted one of the annual resolutions calling upon Israel to renounce possession of nuclear weapons and to place its nuclear facilities under international supervision. Substantively and legally speaking, such resolutions, like all General Assembly resolutions, have no binding legal authority and represent nothing more than the collective, partisan political viewpoint of the automatic majority of states that regularly vote against Israel, no matter what the subject. The resolution was sponsored by the Palestinians together with 20 Arab and African countries, including Israel's allies in the Middle East such as Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan and the UAE. It merely copies the eight previous identical resolutions that have been adopted every year since 2015. Some of the most extreme and fanatical states such as Iran and Syria are parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968. The extent to which such states openly violate their NPT obligations, and persistently threaten Israel, is indicative of the inherent weakness and lack of reliability of the supervision system. Hence, Israel insists on the prior establishment and maintenance of stable regional security conditions. Without such a regional framework, Israel is not prepared to commit itself to the obligations of the NPT while other regional powers maintain a state of war with Israel and constantly threaten Israel's very existence, even while being parties to the NPT. The writer served as the legal advisor to Israel's Foreign Ministry and as Israel's ambassador to Canada.2022-12-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|