Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Twitter) Robert Satloff - The resumption of Saudi-Iran relations has triggered what I believe to be an exaggerated reaction about China's emergence as a Middle East powerbroker and a strategic shift of Riyadh away from its traditional partners. U.S. restrictions on arms sales, strong-arming on Yemen, and inaction on Iran nuclear progress have combined to chip away at Saudi confidence that the U.S. is willing to counter immediate dangers and provide an effective umbrella against strategic threats. Resuming ties with Iran is a dramatic expression of this lack of confidence in the U.S. The Saudis, it seems, are looking not to shift camps but to diversify sources of security. Successive U.S. administrations had no serious plan to stop Iran's nuclear progress or do much to prevent expansion of Iran's regional influence, all the while signaling a desire to escape from Middle East security responsibilities. The Saudis read the tea leaves and acted. But this is a tactical shift, not a strategic change. From ideology to strategy, the Saudis and Iran are bitter rivals and committed adversaries. The writer is Executive Director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2023-03-13 00:00:00Full Article
The Saudis Are Looking Not to Shift Camps but to Diversify Sources of Security
(Twitter) Robert Satloff - The resumption of Saudi-Iran relations has triggered what I believe to be an exaggerated reaction about China's emergence as a Middle East powerbroker and a strategic shift of Riyadh away from its traditional partners. U.S. restrictions on arms sales, strong-arming on Yemen, and inaction on Iran nuclear progress have combined to chip away at Saudi confidence that the U.S. is willing to counter immediate dangers and provide an effective umbrella against strategic threats. Resuming ties with Iran is a dramatic expression of this lack of confidence in the U.S. The Saudis, it seems, are looking not to shift camps but to diversify sources of security. Successive U.S. administrations had no serious plan to stop Iran's nuclear progress or do much to prevent expansion of Iran's regional influence, all the while signaling a desire to escape from Middle East security responsibilities. The Saudis read the tea leaves and acted. But this is a tactical shift, not a strategic change. From ideology to strategy, the Saudis and Iran are bitter rivals and committed adversaries. The writer is Executive Director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2023-03-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|