Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(HonestReporting) Akiva Van Koningsveld - Media pundits have frequently decried IDF counterterrorism raids in Palestinian cities, claiming that these actions somehow violate international law. It is disturbingly common for talking heads, NGOs, and self-declared experts to state that something "violates international law" without saying which law it violates, and without providing any substantial legal analysis as to how it contravenes that law. The Oslo Accords, forged in the 1990s between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), effectively constitute legally binding treaties between the two under customary international law. Per the Oslo process, the Palestinian Authority was given full security and civil control over Area A of the West Bank, which includes all major Palestinian cities. Crucially, the IDF withdrawal from Area A was conditioned on the Palestinian leadership vowing to fight terrorism and incitement to hatred. Indeed, the PA's responsibility to combat terror is enshrined throughout the Oslo agreements. The Vienna Convention which codifies universal rules governing treaties, embraces the principle that international agreements are reciprocal. Accordingly, if the PA refuses to act against incessant terrorism emanating from areas under its control, Israel would likely be entitled to suspend "in whole or in part" its redeployment from parts of the West Bank. In recent years, PA police inaction has led to U.S.-designated terror groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, effectively controlling the streets of Jenin and Nablus. With Ramallah skirting its obligation to apprehend, prosecute, and jail terrorists, Israeli raids on Palestinian terror hubs are not a "violation of international law." On the contrary: the Israeli government has a duty to act against terror groups to protect the safety and welfare of its own citizens. Sadly, social media pundits only seem to care about international law when it can be weaponized against the Jewish state. 2023-03-16 00:00:00Full Article
Do Israeli Arrest Raids "Violate International Law"?
(HonestReporting) Akiva Van Koningsveld - Media pundits have frequently decried IDF counterterrorism raids in Palestinian cities, claiming that these actions somehow violate international law. It is disturbingly common for talking heads, NGOs, and self-declared experts to state that something "violates international law" without saying which law it violates, and without providing any substantial legal analysis as to how it contravenes that law. The Oslo Accords, forged in the 1990s between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), effectively constitute legally binding treaties between the two under customary international law. Per the Oslo process, the Palestinian Authority was given full security and civil control over Area A of the West Bank, which includes all major Palestinian cities. Crucially, the IDF withdrawal from Area A was conditioned on the Palestinian leadership vowing to fight terrorism and incitement to hatred. Indeed, the PA's responsibility to combat terror is enshrined throughout the Oslo agreements. The Vienna Convention which codifies universal rules governing treaties, embraces the principle that international agreements are reciprocal. Accordingly, if the PA refuses to act against incessant terrorism emanating from areas under its control, Israel would likely be entitled to suspend "in whole or in part" its redeployment from parts of the West Bank. In recent years, PA police inaction has led to U.S.-designated terror groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, effectively controlling the streets of Jenin and Nablus. With Ramallah skirting its obligation to apprehend, prosecute, and jail terrorists, Israeli raids on Palestinian terror hubs are not a "violation of international law." On the contrary: the Israeli government has a duty to act against terror groups to protect the safety and welfare of its own citizens. Sadly, social media pundits only seem to care about international law when it can be weaponized against the Jewish state. 2023-03-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|