Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Council on Foreign Relations) Elliott Abrams - The effort to eliminate the Jewish State continues even as Israel celebrates its 75th anniversary, in the belief that one Jewish State, one Jewish homeland, is one too many and cannot be tolerated. This view is receiving new energy nowadays from academics and intellectuals in a new article in Foreign Affairs entitled "Israel's One-State Reality," authored by professors Michael Barnett, Nathan Brown, Marc Lynch, and Shibley Telhami. Their argument is that there is already a one-state reality and that Israel treats non-Jews very badly, that to defend Israel is "defending colonialist principles." The U.S. should acknowledge all this, denounce it, and begin punishing Israel with "sanctions on Israel and Israeli leaders." The authors refer to Arab citizens of Israel as "Palestinians," which is the way only a very small minority of Israeli Arabs characterize themselves. A poll by the Israel Democracy Institute found that 77% of Arab Israelis "feel part of the state." In that poll the great majority of Israeli Arabs believe they have a common destiny with other Israelis. "The proportion of non-Jewish people who define themselves primarily as 'Palestinian' now stands at around 7%." The authors urge that "Although Washington cannot prevent normalization of relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors, the United States should not lead such efforts." The clear suggestion here is that if it were possible to "prevent normalization," that would be fine. The article calls for the end of the State of Israel as it has existed since 1948. By publishing this article, Foreign Affairs has served only to show us the state of the debate in academia. The goal of many of today's academic critics is not to reform the State of Israel but to eliminate it. The writer, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the CFR, served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. 2023-05-11 00:00:00Full Article
As Israel Turns 75, Foreign Affairs Publishes a Call to Eliminate It
(Council on Foreign Relations) Elliott Abrams - The effort to eliminate the Jewish State continues even as Israel celebrates its 75th anniversary, in the belief that one Jewish State, one Jewish homeland, is one too many and cannot be tolerated. This view is receiving new energy nowadays from academics and intellectuals in a new article in Foreign Affairs entitled "Israel's One-State Reality," authored by professors Michael Barnett, Nathan Brown, Marc Lynch, and Shibley Telhami. Their argument is that there is already a one-state reality and that Israel treats non-Jews very badly, that to defend Israel is "defending colonialist principles." The U.S. should acknowledge all this, denounce it, and begin punishing Israel with "sanctions on Israel and Israeli leaders." The authors refer to Arab citizens of Israel as "Palestinians," which is the way only a very small minority of Israeli Arabs characterize themselves. A poll by the Israel Democracy Institute found that 77% of Arab Israelis "feel part of the state." In that poll the great majority of Israeli Arabs believe they have a common destiny with other Israelis. "The proportion of non-Jewish people who define themselves primarily as 'Palestinian' now stands at around 7%." The authors urge that "Although Washington cannot prevent normalization of relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors, the United States should not lead such efforts." The clear suggestion here is that if it were possible to "prevent normalization," that would be fine. The article calls for the end of the State of Israel as it has existed since 1948. By publishing this article, Foreign Affairs has served only to show us the state of the debate in academia. The goal of many of today's academic critics is not to reform the State of Israel but to eliminate it. The writer, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the CFR, served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. 2023-05-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|