Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(JNS) Mitchell Bard - In the new Biden administration strategy to combat antisemitism, without the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, all but the most blatant forms of antisemitism will be ignored, and antisemites will define the threat to exclude themselves. What drives critics to apoplexy are the examples of modern manifestations of antisemitism, which "might include the targeting of the State of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity." For decades, antisemites have gotten a pass by simply replacing the word "Jew" with "Israel(i)" or "Zionist." The IHRA called their bluff by stripping away the fig leaf. Martin Luther King Jr. saw through the masquerade decades ago when he declared: "When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking antisemitism." The biggest red herring of the critics is that adopting the IHRA will unconstitutionally deny people their right to free speech by prohibiting criticism of Israel. Are there any sentient beings unaware of criticism of Israel? Read the New York Times for a week. Have you ever noticed that the people who complain the loudest about being silenced are the ones who regularly demonize Israel with impunity?2023-05-29 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Antisemitism Strategy Is Futile without the IHRA Definition
(JNS) Mitchell Bard - In the new Biden administration strategy to combat antisemitism, without the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, all but the most blatant forms of antisemitism will be ignored, and antisemites will define the threat to exclude themselves. What drives critics to apoplexy are the examples of modern manifestations of antisemitism, which "might include the targeting of the State of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity." For decades, antisemites have gotten a pass by simply replacing the word "Jew" with "Israel(i)" or "Zionist." The IHRA called their bluff by stripping away the fig leaf. Martin Luther King Jr. saw through the masquerade decades ago when he declared: "When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking antisemitism." The biggest red herring of the critics is that adopting the IHRA will unconstitutionally deny people their right to free speech by prohibiting criticism of Israel. Are there any sentient beings unaware of criticism of Israel? Read the New York Times for a week. Have you ever noticed that the people who complain the loudest about being silenced are the ones who regularly demonize Israel with impunity?2023-05-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|