Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(JNS) Jonathan S. Tobin - Following years of terrorism and bloodshed rather than a historic reconciliation following the Oslo Accords, for the overwhelming majority of Israelis, the accords proved an epic disaster rooted in wishful thinking. Yet some still stubbornly look for explanations other than the obvious one about the Palestinian lack of interest in ending their century-old war on Zionism and the Jews. Instead of trading land for peace, all Israel did was exchange territory for terrorism. Prior to Oslo, the arguments in favor of land for peace were much stronger than they are now that Arafat and Abbas demonstrated that no matter what they were offered or given, they were still unwilling to accept the legitimacy of a Jewish state, no matter where its borders were drawn. The international community isn't any more sympathetic to Israel as a result of the risks it ran and sacrifices it made than they were before 1993. Indeed, it is entirely possible that they are less sympathetic to an Israel that was willing to gamble with the likes of a veteran terrorist like Arafat. Rather than interpreting Oslo as a generous gesture in which tangible assets and territory to which Israel had at least as good a claim as the Arabs were given up in exchange for the hope of some quietude, the international community viewed it as an Israeli admission of guilt for holding onto stolen goods. 2023-09-11 00:00:00Full Article
The Lessons of Oslo Remain Unlearned
(JNS) Jonathan S. Tobin - Following years of terrorism and bloodshed rather than a historic reconciliation following the Oslo Accords, for the overwhelming majority of Israelis, the accords proved an epic disaster rooted in wishful thinking. Yet some still stubbornly look for explanations other than the obvious one about the Palestinian lack of interest in ending their century-old war on Zionism and the Jews. Instead of trading land for peace, all Israel did was exchange territory for terrorism. Prior to Oslo, the arguments in favor of land for peace were much stronger than they are now that Arafat and Abbas demonstrated that no matter what they were offered or given, they were still unwilling to accept the legitimacy of a Jewish state, no matter where its borders were drawn. The international community isn't any more sympathetic to Israel as a result of the risks it ran and sacrifices it made than they were before 1993. Indeed, it is entirely possible that they are less sympathetic to an Israel that was willing to gamble with the likes of a veteran terrorist like Arafat. Rather than interpreting Oslo as a generous gesture in which tangible assets and territory to which Israel had at least as good a claim as the Arabs were given up in exchange for the hope of some quietude, the international community viewed it as an Israeli admission of guilt for holding onto stolen goods. 2023-09-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|