Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - The idea of a U.S.-Israel mutual defense treaty is enjoying a renaissance. Although the idea of a defense pact that would obligate the U.S. to come to Israel's defense in case of an existential threat is enticing, it is something Jerusalem needs to consider very carefully because, along with the advantages, there are also drawbacks. The most obvious benefit is its message to Iran and other enemies of Israel. If such a treaty is ratified by a Senate supermajority, it locks U.S. commitments into a permanent framework. However, such a treaty could potentially reduce Israel's freedom of action and mean that Israel would need U.S. permission to act militarily. Paradoxically, a deal intended to deter Israel's enemies could actually diminish deterrence by tying Israel's hands, particularly when it comes to Iran. Moreover, a mutual defense pact might potentially draw Israel into conflicts that would imperil its relations with other countries and undermine other Israeli interests. Finally, such a pact conflicts with the key Zionist principle of self-reliance. Would such a pact be so superior to the current understandings with the U.S.? 2023-09-26 00:00:00Full Article
Is an Israel-U.S. Defense Pact in Israel's Best Interests?
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - The idea of a U.S.-Israel mutual defense treaty is enjoying a renaissance. Although the idea of a defense pact that would obligate the U.S. to come to Israel's defense in case of an existential threat is enticing, it is something Jerusalem needs to consider very carefully because, along with the advantages, there are also drawbacks. The most obvious benefit is its message to Iran and other enemies of Israel. If such a treaty is ratified by a Senate supermajority, it locks U.S. commitments into a permanent framework. However, such a treaty could potentially reduce Israel's freedom of action and mean that Israel would need U.S. permission to act militarily. Paradoxically, a deal intended to deter Israel's enemies could actually diminish deterrence by tying Israel's hands, particularly when it comes to Iran. Moreover, a mutual defense pact might potentially draw Israel into conflicts that would imperil its relations with other countries and undermine other Israeli interests. Finally, such a pact conflicts with the key Zionist principle of self-reliance. Would such a pact be so superior to the current understandings with the U.S.? 2023-09-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|