Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Interest) David Makovsky - Israel assumed that under the heavy burden of governing Gaza, Hamas would feel the need to prove itself through economic performance. It was believed that economic inducements towards Hamas would moderate its foundational belief that Israel is an illegitimate entity whose very existence must be extinguished and its citizens killed. Economic advancement would bring calm, as it gave Hamas something to lose. This basic assumption was similarly held by many American and European diplomats. In hindsight, there were many indicators that, for Hamas, ideology trumped economics. Hamas used any economic gains not to improve public welfare but rather to secure armaments and build tunnels under Gaza for its fighters. Rocket production took precedence over civilian infrastructure. Reeling from the consequence of its failed concept, Israel is determined not to underestimate Hamas' dedication to its violent ideology again. The writer, a former senior advisor to the U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations, is a Fellow at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2023-10-29 00:00:00Full Article
Expecting Hamas to Abandon Ideology for Economics Was a Mistake
(National Interest) David Makovsky - Israel assumed that under the heavy burden of governing Gaza, Hamas would feel the need to prove itself through economic performance. It was believed that economic inducements towards Hamas would moderate its foundational belief that Israel is an illegitimate entity whose very existence must be extinguished and its citizens killed. Economic advancement would bring calm, as it gave Hamas something to lose. This basic assumption was similarly held by many American and European diplomats. In hindsight, there were many indicators that, for Hamas, ideology trumped economics. Hamas used any economic gains not to improve public welfare but rather to secure armaments and build tunnels under Gaza for its fighters. Rocket production took precedence over civilian infrastructure. Reeling from the consequence of its failed concept, Israel is determined not to underestimate Hamas' dedication to its violent ideology again. The writer, a former senior advisor to the U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations, is a Fellow at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2023-10-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|