Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[ Boston Globe] Michael Bergman - The debate over whether or not to engage Syria is once again center stage this week as a Syrian delegation visits Washington. What should America ask from Syria in their negotiations? Many policy analysts argue that the "low-hanging fruit" is an Israeli-Syrian peace treaty. They recommend requiring Syria to actively pursue a peace treaty with Israel in return for full U.S. engagement and resumption of full diplomatic relations. However, a look at the political dynamics in Israel reveals that such an agreement would not be imminent. The Israeli Parliament is considering a law that will require the government to bring any agreement pertaining to a withdrawal from the Golan Heights to a national referendum. The issue of relinquishing the Golan Heights encounters three significant barriers. The first is a strong grass-roots lobby on behalf of Israel maintaining the Golan. The second is a lack of urgency in the Israeli public to resolve this dispute due to the absence of an occupied population in this area - significantly different from the approach to the West Bank. The third is that the Israeli public views a withdrawal from the Golan as a significant security risk. Syrian leaders have other items of higher priority on their agenda before a peace agreement with Israel. More important for them is regaining their dominance over Lebanon and breaking out of their international isolation through full engagement with the U.S. Syria must choose between its top priorities. If Assad wants to pursue domination over Lebanon and his support for Hizbullah, he should find no friend in Washington. However, if he wants to engage the U.S., he would need to end the weapons flow to Hizbullah, demarcate his borders with Lebanon, and establish full diplomatic relations with it - treating it as a fully sovereign state. The Syrians are not eager to "give up" their attempts at domination over Lebanon. But using the leverage of a U.S.-Syrian relationship is the best way to achieve this American interest. 2008-07-23 01:00:00Full Article
Realism Must Rule in Engaging Syria
[ Boston Globe] Michael Bergman - The debate over whether or not to engage Syria is once again center stage this week as a Syrian delegation visits Washington. What should America ask from Syria in their negotiations? Many policy analysts argue that the "low-hanging fruit" is an Israeli-Syrian peace treaty. They recommend requiring Syria to actively pursue a peace treaty with Israel in return for full U.S. engagement and resumption of full diplomatic relations. However, a look at the political dynamics in Israel reveals that such an agreement would not be imminent. The Israeli Parliament is considering a law that will require the government to bring any agreement pertaining to a withdrawal from the Golan Heights to a national referendum. The issue of relinquishing the Golan Heights encounters three significant barriers. The first is a strong grass-roots lobby on behalf of Israel maintaining the Golan. The second is a lack of urgency in the Israeli public to resolve this dispute due to the absence of an occupied population in this area - significantly different from the approach to the West Bank. The third is that the Israeli public views a withdrawal from the Golan as a significant security risk. Syrian leaders have other items of higher priority on their agenda before a peace agreement with Israel. More important for them is regaining their dominance over Lebanon and breaking out of their international isolation through full engagement with the U.S. Syria must choose between its top priorities. If Assad wants to pursue domination over Lebanon and his support for Hizbullah, he should find no friend in Washington. However, if he wants to engage the U.S., he would need to end the weapons flow to Hizbullah, demarcate his borders with Lebanon, and establish full diplomatic relations with it - treating it as a fully sovereign state. The Syrians are not eager to "give up" their attempts at domination over Lebanon. But using the leverage of a U.S.-Syrian relationship is the best way to achieve this American interest. 2008-07-23 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|