Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(JNS) Melanie Phillips - U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said last week that the administration was "actively pursuing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state." It's one thing to press for movement towards a Palestine state. Unilaterally recognizing it crosses a red line. Official recognition of a "Palestine" that doesn't exist is part of the strategy of diplomatic warfare against Israel promoted by those who want to see the Jewish state destroyed. Conceptually ridiculous, since it involves recognizing a "state" that has no physical form and no boundaries, it would remove at a stroke the necessity for the Palestinian Arabs to agree to live in peace alongside Israel. Instead, it would incentivize still further their rejection of Israel's right to exist. And what a time to announce this, when Israel is in the throes of a war for its existence after the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. A Palestinian state would be a Hamastan on steroids. While Israel is forced to sacrifice the flower of its youth as it fights for its life, its so-called allies threaten to hang the Jewish state out to dry once again. The writer is a columnist for The Times-UK.2024-02-05 00:00:00Full Article
An Obsession with a Two-State Solution Threatens to Incentivize Hamas
(JNS) Melanie Phillips - U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said last week that the administration was "actively pursuing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state." It's one thing to press for movement towards a Palestine state. Unilaterally recognizing it crosses a red line. Official recognition of a "Palestine" that doesn't exist is part of the strategy of diplomatic warfare against Israel promoted by those who want to see the Jewish state destroyed. Conceptually ridiculous, since it involves recognizing a "state" that has no physical form and no boundaries, it would remove at a stroke the necessity for the Palestinian Arabs to agree to live in peace alongside Israel. Instead, it would incentivize still further their rejection of Israel's right to exist. And what a time to announce this, when Israel is in the throes of a war for its existence after the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. A Palestinian state would be a Hamastan on steroids. While Israel is forced to sacrifice the flower of its youth as it fights for its life, its so-called allies threaten to hang the Jewish state out to dry once again. The writer is a columnist for The Times-UK.2024-02-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|