Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Council on Foreign Relations) Elliott Abrams - On Feb. 7, Secretary of State Blinken visited Israel and called for "a concrete, time-bound and irreversible path" to a Palestinian state. The danger to Israel implicit in these remarks is very great. What Blinken has done here is to destroy any preconditions. Blinken, of course, said that new state should live side-by-side with Israel in peace, but he did not make that a condition of its creation. If the path forward is "time-bound and irreversible," there are by definition no conditions that would slow or preclude creating that state. Not Iranian influence, not Hamas control, not support for terrorism, not teaching hatred of Jews, not importing weapons, not building tunnels into Israel, not brutal repression of Palestinian voices that criticize those in power. Nothing. Have we learned nothing in the last 20 years, watching the Palestinian Authority degenerate into a corrupt and ineffective autocracy that Palestinians loathe, while Iranian support helped Hamas turn Gaza into a murderous headquarters for anti-Israel violence? George W. Bush once spoke of the soft bigotry of low expectations, and that is part of what we see here. Blinken's statement demands nothing of Palestinians. They are not asked to confront hatred of Jews, not asked to end terrorism, not asked to create decent and effective governance. They are asked for nothing. And if that is what they are asked for, that is what they will deliver. The writer, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at CFR, served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. 2024-02-09 00:00:00Full Article
Is the Path to a Palestinian State "Irreversible?"
(Council on Foreign Relations) Elliott Abrams - On Feb. 7, Secretary of State Blinken visited Israel and called for "a concrete, time-bound and irreversible path" to a Palestinian state. The danger to Israel implicit in these remarks is very great. What Blinken has done here is to destroy any preconditions. Blinken, of course, said that new state should live side-by-side with Israel in peace, but he did not make that a condition of its creation. If the path forward is "time-bound and irreversible," there are by definition no conditions that would slow or preclude creating that state. Not Iranian influence, not Hamas control, not support for terrorism, not teaching hatred of Jews, not importing weapons, not building tunnels into Israel, not brutal repression of Palestinian voices that criticize those in power. Nothing. Have we learned nothing in the last 20 years, watching the Palestinian Authority degenerate into a corrupt and ineffective autocracy that Palestinians loathe, while Iranian support helped Hamas turn Gaza into a murderous headquarters for anti-Israel violence? George W. Bush once spoke of the soft bigotry of low expectations, and that is part of what we see here. Blinken's statement demands nothing of Palestinians. They are not asked to confront hatred of Jews, not asked to end terrorism, not asked to create decent and effective governance. They are asked for nothing. And if that is what they are asked for, that is what they will deliver. The writer, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at CFR, served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East for the White House. 2024-02-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|