Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) David Makovsky - The U.S. and several Arab states are in discussions to develop a comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace plan with a "firm timeline" for the establishment of a Palestinian state, the Washington Post reported. Yet Israeli reservations about a Palestinian state go well beyond Netanyahu and are based on real and urgent concerns, security chief among them. This must be dealt with seriously by linking progress on Palestinian statehood to meeting clear security benchmarks, without which instability is certain. An American effort that does not take this into account risks misreading Israeli politics and the concerns of a majority of Israelis across the political spectrum. In January, 59% of Jewish Israelis rejected a two-state solution as part of a package of U.S. guarantees and normalization with Arab states. A month before Oct. 7, only 32% of Israeli Jews thought Israel and a Palestinian state could coexist peacefully. Many Israelis support the idea of a compromise for peace but are wary of abandoning the status quo without an agreement with a partner they trust - in their view, the only way to provide real security and actually end the conflict. For now, though, most Israelis associate two states with a profound security risk and prefer the status quo, despite its dangers. That concern is well-founded: for the past 30 years, Israeli withdrawal from the Palestinian arena has often led to violence, not peace. The writer is a Fellow at the Washington Institute and director of its Project on Arab-Israel Relations.2024-02-19 00:00:00Full Article
Israeli Skepticism over a Palestinian State Is Based on Real and Urgent Concerns
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) David Makovsky - The U.S. and several Arab states are in discussions to develop a comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian peace plan with a "firm timeline" for the establishment of a Palestinian state, the Washington Post reported. Yet Israeli reservations about a Palestinian state go well beyond Netanyahu and are based on real and urgent concerns, security chief among them. This must be dealt with seriously by linking progress on Palestinian statehood to meeting clear security benchmarks, without which instability is certain. An American effort that does not take this into account risks misreading Israeli politics and the concerns of a majority of Israelis across the political spectrum. In January, 59% of Jewish Israelis rejected a two-state solution as part of a package of U.S. guarantees and normalization with Arab states. A month before Oct. 7, only 32% of Israeli Jews thought Israel and a Palestinian state could coexist peacefully. Many Israelis support the idea of a compromise for peace but are wary of abandoning the status quo without an agreement with a partner they trust - in their view, the only way to provide real security and actually end the conflict. For now, though, most Israelis associate two states with a profound security risk and prefer the status quo, despite its dangers. That concern is well-founded: for the past 30 years, Israeli withdrawal from the Palestinian arena has often led to violence, not peace. The writer is a Fellow at the Washington Institute and director of its Project on Arab-Israel Relations.2024-02-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|