Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Singh - Arab leaders seem adamant that the U.S. recognize Palestinian statehood unilaterally at the outset of any peace push, without waiting for Israeli concurrence. Saudi policymakers seem to fear that Arab public opinion will not brook a normalization agreement without major concessions on Palestinian statehood. They also seem to believe that neither Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nor any of his likely successors would agree to such concessions in the near future, since Israeli public opinion would presumably regard them as a reward for the atrocities of Oct. 7. Unilateral recognition is both a political nonstarter in the U.S. and an unwise policy step. Declaring a Palestinian state without agreements on its borders, capital, or security relations with Israel could worsen the already dire situation between the two parties and set the stage for deeper conflict. In Israel's view, the outcome of its decisions to withdraw from south Lebanon in 2000 and Gaza in 2005 demonstrate the futility of simply declaring a problem solved without negotiating arrangements to keep the peace. Although the Gaza crisis has complicated the situation, Arab normalization with Israel can still help promote peace. Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict requires a narrative of coexistence to counter Hamas' narrative of grievance and revenge. For two decades now, the U.S. has embarked on a string of impatient Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts that have collectively set the process back. What is needed today is patience. The writer, managing director and senior fellow at The Washington Institute, was former senior director for Middle East affairs at the U.S. National Security Council. 2024-03-07 00:00:00Full Article
Unilateral U.S. Recognition of Palestinian Statehood Is a Political Nonstarter and an Unwise Policy Step
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Singh - Arab leaders seem adamant that the U.S. recognize Palestinian statehood unilaterally at the outset of any peace push, without waiting for Israeli concurrence. Saudi policymakers seem to fear that Arab public opinion will not brook a normalization agreement without major concessions on Palestinian statehood. They also seem to believe that neither Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nor any of his likely successors would agree to such concessions in the near future, since Israeli public opinion would presumably regard them as a reward for the atrocities of Oct. 7. Unilateral recognition is both a political nonstarter in the U.S. and an unwise policy step. Declaring a Palestinian state without agreements on its borders, capital, or security relations with Israel could worsen the already dire situation between the two parties and set the stage for deeper conflict. In Israel's view, the outcome of its decisions to withdraw from south Lebanon in 2000 and Gaza in 2005 demonstrate the futility of simply declaring a problem solved without negotiating arrangements to keep the peace. Although the Gaza crisis has complicated the situation, Arab normalization with Israel can still help promote peace. Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict requires a narrative of coexistence to counter Hamas' narrative of grievance and revenge. For two decades now, the U.S. has embarked on a string of impatient Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts that have collectively set the process back. What is needed today is patience. The writer, managing director and senior fellow at The Washington Institute, was former senior director for Middle East affairs at the U.S. National Security Council. 2024-03-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|