Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Sunday Telegraph-UK) Nick Timothy - The Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) is one of several organizations declared extremist by Secretary of State for Communities Michael Gove in Parliament last week. Previously, an expert government report called it "the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK." Its concern for civil liberties does not apply to those who criticize Islamism, comment on Islam in ways it dislikes, or depict Mohammed in ways it finds offensive. It is among the organizations pushing for an official definition of "Islamophobia," a one-religion blasphemy law that would be used to limit scrutiny of Islamists. British politicians and those in wider society urgently need to understand who these extremists are, which organizations speak for them, and where their ideas come from. If they fail to do so, not only violence but political subjugation awaits us. Sermons by some imams in British mosques quote the Koran and sayings of Mohammed recorded in hadiths to justify hatred and violence. Many Muslims reject this, citing passages of the Koran that say, "let there be no compulsion in religion." As many moderates and reformers like to argue, there is a scriptural justification for pluralism and tolerance within Islam. According to the expert government review, the Brotherhood "shaped the Islamic Society of Britain, dominated the Muslim Association of Britain and played an important role in establishing and then running the Muslim Council of Britain." Yet the public sector, including the NHS, police and military, partners with these organizations and others like them. The media allows news content to be policed by entities created by them. Many receive direct public funding and the tax advantages of charitable status. This is why it is vital that the Government defines extremism, identifies extremist organizations and shuns, punishes and proscribes them accordingly. 2024-03-19 00:00:00Full Article
The Islamist Threat in the UK Is All Too Real
(Sunday Telegraph-UK) Nick Timothy - The Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) is one of several organizations declared extremist by Secretary of State for Communities Michael Gove in Parliament last week. Previously, an expert government report called it "the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK." Its concern for civil liberties does not apply to those who criticize Islamism, comment on Islam in ways it dislikes, or depict Mohammed in ways it finds offensive. It is among the organizations pushing for an official definition of "Islamophobia," a one-religion blasphemy law that would be used to limit scrutiny of Islamists. British politicians and those in wider society urgently need to understand who these extremists are, which organizations speak for them, and where their ideas come from. If they fail to do so, not only violence but political subjugation awaits us. Sermons by some imams in British mosques quote the Koran and sayings of Mohammed recorded in hadiths to justify hatred and violence. Many Muslims reject this, citing passages of the Koran that say, "let there be no compulsion in religion." As many moderates and reformers like to argue, there is a scriptural justification for pluralism and tolerance within Islam. According to the expert government review, the Brotherhood "shaped the Islamic Society of Britain, dominated the Muslim Association of Britain and played an important role in establishing and then running the Muslim Council of Britain." Yet the public sector, including the NHS, police and military, partners with these organizations and others like them. The media allows news content to be policed by entities created by them. Many receive direct public funding and the tax advantages of charitable status. This is why it is vital that the Government defines extremism, identifies extremist organizations and shuns, punishes and proscribes them accordingly. 2024-03-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|