Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Prof. Kobi Michael - The enmity between Fatah and Hamas, rooted in ideological differences, centers around the competition to lead the Palestinian national struggle. Currently, what Hamas views as the national war of liberation on a historic scale, comparable to Salah al-Din's victory over the Crusaders, Fatah sees as a national catastrophe worse than the Nakba in 1948. The ongoing hostility between Fatah and Hamas, as long as Hamas retains de facto control over Gaza, means that even if a ceasefire is reached, it will not be possible to begin the process of rebuilding Gaza. In light of the current situation, Israel is being pushed toward establishing a temporary military administration in Gaza. This is because there are no viable alternatives. Hamas is not an option, the return of the PA to the Strip is unrealistic, and there is no regional or international entity ready to take action. Without any effective control of the area, Israel cannot ensure that humanitarian aid reaches its intended recipients. Furthermore, without an alternative to Hamas, the population will continue to believe in the possibility of its survival and continued rule. Therefore, Israel should announce the formation of a temporary military administration in northern Gaza, where there are relatively few residents and weakened Hamas infrastructures. This would help ensure that humanitarian aid reaches the intended recipients, while bypassing Hamas. It would send a clear message to the Palestinian people that Hamas is no longer a viable option, which could weaken its popular support. This could lay the groundwork for the entry of an international or regional task force to assume authority over the management of the area and its population. The writer is a senior researcher at INSS. 2024-03-21 00:00:00Full Article
Internal Palestinian Rivalry Pushes Israel toward Temporary Military Administration in Gaza
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Prof. Kobi Michael - The enmity between Fatah and Hamas, rooted in ideological differences, centers around the competition to lead the Palestinian national struggle. Currently, what Hamas views as the national war of liberation on a historic scale, comparable to Salah al-Din's victory over the Crusaders, Fatah sees as a national catastrophe worse than the Nakba in 1948. The ongoing hostility between Fatah and Hamas, as long as Hamas retains de facto control over Gaza, means that even if a ceasefire is reached, it will not be possible to begin the process of rebuilding Gaza. In light of the current situation, Israel is being pushed toward establishing a temporary military administration in Gaza. This is because there are no viable alternatives. Hamas is not an option, the return of the PA to the Strip is unrealistic, and there is no regional or international entity ready to take action. Without any effective control of the area, Israel cannot ensure that humanitarian aid reaches its intended recipients. Furthermore, without an alternative to Hamas, the population will continue to believe in the possibility of its survival and continued rule. Therefore, Israel should announce the formation of a temporary military administration in northern Gaza, where there are relatively few residents and weakened Hamas infrastructures. This would help ensure that humanitarian aid reaches the intended recipients, while bypassing Hamas. It would send a clear message to the Palestinian people that Hamas is no longer a viable option, which could weaken its popular support. This could lay the groundwork for the entry of an international or regional task force to assume authority over the management of the area and its population. The writer is a senior researcher at INSS. 2024-03-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|