Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Daniel Finkelstein - Aware that Israel's supporters and its critics have been talking past each other, I decided to write an article for The London Times in which I set out some of the things critics had been saying that I might be willing to accept. I had written that I was trying to establish a dialogue in which all of us showed we were listening to each other. But I didn't get the dialogue I had been asking for. Not in a single email. Not in a single tweet. Not one person matched my concessions with concessions of their own. The only replies I got were to tell me I was right to concede and demand more. I wrote another column repeating the arguments and was even more explicit this time about seeking a response. But still, I got nothing. My experience has reinforced the feeling that quite a lot of the protest rhetoric is dishonest. The protest is not against Israel's actions, it is simply against Israel. There is nothing that Israel can do that will satisfy the demands the protesters are making. They do not actually want a dialogue. Without this, what is there to talk about? All one can do is resist militarily and politically until a change in attitude takes place. The writer is associate editor of The London Times.2024-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Critics Aren't Interested in Dialogue
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Daniel Finkelstein - Aware that Israel's supporters and its critics have been talking past each other, I decided to write an article for The London Times in which I set out some of the things critics had been saying that I might be willing to accept. I had written that I was trying to establish a dialogue in which all of us showed we were listening to each other. But I didn't get the dialogue I had been asking for. Not in a single email. Not in a single tweet. Not one person matched my concessions with concessions of their own. The only replies I got were to tell me I was right to concede and demand more. I wrote another column repeating the arguments and was even more explicit this time about seeking a response. But still, I got nothing. My experience has reinforced the feeling that quite a lot of the protest rhetoric is dishonest. The protest is not against Israel's actions, it is simply against Israel. There is nothing that Israel can do that will satisfy the demands the protesters are making. They do not actually want a dialogue. Without this, what is there to talk about? All one can do is resist militarily and politically until a change in attitude takes place. The writer is associate editor of The London Times.2024-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|