Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Telegraph-UK) Charles Moore - On Thursday, 809 former judges, KCs, barristers, solicitors and academic lawyers wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak "reminding" him of his "obligations" under international law in relation to Israel's actions in Gaza and called for him to suspend "the provision of weapons and weapons systems to the government of Israel." By way of legal justification, the letter cited the "provisional order" of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in January which, it alleged, "concluded that there was plausible risk of genocide in Gaza." No, that is wrong, says Joshua Rozenberg, the Telegraph's former legal affairs editor. The phrase "plausible risk" does not occur in the ICJ's order. The court could not possibly have come to this view, as it had not heard evidence and made a judgment. All it decided was that South Africa's arguments for making a case before it were plausible enough to be heard. This suggests that the letter is political, and part of a wider political campaign. The help we get from the Israelis is greater than what we give them. We have a deep level of trust and technological synergy in intelligence. Do we want to break that trust? By breaking our arms trade with Israel, we would be sending a signal to other clients that when they get into difficult situations, we are ready to drop them. To resist the power of evil, it is sometimes absolutely necessary to use lethal force. Unfortunately, it is not the case, particularly when fighting people such as Hamas who have no scruples about murdering civilians or using them as human shields, that lethal force can always be neatly contained. If our societies cannot accept this, our own armies will be reduced to toothless peace-keeping forces and there will be precious little peace for them to keep.2024-04-09 00:00:00Full Article
There Are Times when Civilization Depends on the Use of Lethal Force
(Telegraph-UK) Charles Moore - On Thursday, 809 former judges, KCs, barristers, solicitors and academic lawyers wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak "reminding" him of his "obligations" under international law in relation to Israel's actions in Gaza and called for him to suspend "the provision of weapons and weapons systems to the government of Israel." By way of legal justification, the letter cited the "provisional order" of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in January which, it alleged, "concluded that there was plausible risk of genocide in Gaza." No, that is wrong, says Joshua Rozenberg, the Telegraph's former legal affairs editor. The phrase "plausible risk" does not occur in the ICJ's order. The court could not possibly have come to this view, as it had not heard evidence and made a judgment. All it decided was that South Africa's arguments for making a case before it were plausible enough to be heard. This suggests that the letter is political, and part of a wider political campaign. The help we get from the Israelis is greater than what we give them. We have a deep level of trust and technological synergy in intelligence. Do we want to break that trust? By breaking our arms trade with Israel, we would be sending a signal to other clients that when they get into difficult situations, we are ready to drop them. To resist the power of evil, it is sometimes absolutely necessary to use lethal force. Unfortunately, it is not the case, particularly when fighting people such as Hamas who have no scruples about murdering civilians or using them as human shields, that lethal force can always be neatly contained. If our societies cannot accept this, our own armies will be reduced to toothless peace-keeping forces and there will be precious little peace for them to keep.2024-04-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|