Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser - The presumed Israeli attack on Iran clarified to the Iranians that whereas we are not as vulnerable as they thought, they are more vulnerable than they thought. They have difficulty hitting us, but we have no difficulty hitting them. Nobody wants to see an escalation, so the strike was conducted in a way that doesn't have to lead to escalation. The fact that we chose targets that were in the vicinity of a major nuclear facility, but were linked to the Iranian missiles and airforce, communicated that we can reach other targets as well. Since we don't want escalation, we chose targets nearby that were involved in the attack against Israel. If we want to, we can send a stronger message. The main mission on our agenda is to finish the war in Gaza. We have hostages to release. We have Hamas to destroy. We must focus on that. At the same time, the strike indicates that our options are open to take further action at the time of our choosing. The writer, Director, National Security and Middle East Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, is former head of the IDF Military Intelligence Research Division. 2024-04-21 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Strike Was the Perfect Response
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser - The presumed Israeli attack on Iran clarified to the Iranians that whereas we are not as vulnerable as they thought, they are more vulnerable than they thought. They have difficulty hitting us, but we have no difficulty hitting them. Nobody wants to see an escalation, so the strike was conducted in a way that doesn't have to lead to escalation. The fact that we chose targets that were in the vicinity of a major nuclear facility, but were linked to the Iranian missiles and airforce, communicated that we can reach other targets as well. Since we don't want escalation, we chose targets nearby that were involved in the attack against Israel. If we want to, we can send a stronger message. The main mission on our agenda is to finish the war in Gaza. We have hostages to release. We have Hamas to destroy. We must focus on that. At the same time, the strike indicates that our options are open to take further action at the time of our choosing. The writer, Director, National Security and Middle East Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, is former head of the IDF Military Intelligence Research Division. 2024-04-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|