Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Gerald M. Steinberg - Many Israelis, as well as American politicians and Jewish leaders, denounced President Biden for going back on his emphatic pledges to do everything necessary to help Israel defend itself, defeat Hamas and return the hostages. A look at the details suggests this was part of a carefully planned U.S. strategy, under the heading of a Grand Bargain for the Middle East. This dream scenario has been in the background of Administration policies for months. The essential elements include an "irrevocable commitment" to Palestinian statehood, a large-scale Israeli withdrawal on the West Bank, and a formal Saudi-Israeli peace agreement echoing the Abraham Accords. It begins in Rafah, through orchestrating a stalemate and ceasefire that prevents Israel from totally defeating and uprooting Hamas. The problem is that the entire scenario is built on a foundation of wishful thinking, not history and political realism. The 1993 Oslo "peace" plan was based on the same illusions, and ended in the Second Intifada, in which over 1,000 Israelis were murdered in mass bombings, and thousands more died on the Palestinian side. For Hamas, the freezing of weapons deliveries, the wider conflict between Washington and Jerusalem, and demands for a ceasefire on their terms are a huge gift. Their propagandists, including the campus groups, interpret the Biden freeze as a great victory, encouraging these activists to continue and escalate the campaign of chaos and hate. In Tehran, regime leaders draw strength from the very visible American constraints placed on Israel, including after the Iranian missile attack on Israel on April 13. Most Israelis understand the massive gap between optimistic dream scenarios and political realism. Israeli territorial withdrawals from West Bank cities in 1994, southern Lebanon in 2000, and Gaza in 2005 have ended with mass terror and slaughter. Withholding munitions to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah will lead to increased Palestinian determination to attack Israel. The writer, emeritus professor of political studies at Bar Ilan University and president of NGO Monitor, is a fellow of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.2024-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
Biden's "Grand Bargain" Illusion Starts at Rafah
(Jerusalem Post) Gerald M. Steinberg - Many Israelis, as well as American politicians and Jewish leaders, denounced President Biden for going back on his emphatic pledges to do everything necessary to help Israel defend itself, defeat Hamas and return the hostages. A look at the details suggests this was part of a carefully planned U.S. strategy, under the heading of a Grand Bargain for the Middle East. This dream scenario has been in the background of Administration policies for months. The essential elements include an "irrevocable commitment" to Palestinian statehood, a large-scale Israeli withdrawal on the West Bank, and a formal Saudi-Israeli peace agreement echoing the Abraham Accords. It begins in Rafah, through orchestrating a stalemate and ceasefire that prevents Israel from totally defeating and uprooting Hamas. The problem is that the entire scenario is built on a foundation of wishful thinking, not history and political realism. The 1993 Oslo "peace" plan was based on the same illusions, and ended in the Second Intifada, in which over 1,000 Israelis were murdered in mass bombings, and thousands more died on the Palestinian side. For Hamas, the freezing of weapons deliveries, the wider conflict between Washington and Jerusalem, and demands for a ceasefire on their terms are a huge gift. Their propagandists, including the campus groups, interpret the Biden freeze as a great victory, encouraging these activists to continue and escalate the campaign of chaos and hate. In Tehran, regime leaders draw strength from the very visible American constraints placed on Israel, including after the Iranian missile attack on Israel on April 13. Most Israelis understand the massive gap between optimistic dream scenarios and political realism. Israeli territorial withdrawals from West Bank cities in 1994, southern Lebanon in 2000, and Gaza in 2005 have ended with mass terror and slaughter. Withholding munitions to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah will lead to increased Palestinian determination to attack Israel. The writer, emeritus professor of political studies at Bar Ilan University and president of NGO Monitor, is a fellow of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.2024-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|