Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(MEMRI) A. Savyon and N. Katirachi - Tehran may not launch hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel as it did in April because it fears a harsh Israeli response. Instead, it favors vengeance by means of its proxies, while extracting as much as it can from the Americans and Europeans in exchange for not going to war against Israel. According to reports, discussions in Iran's security leadership raised additional possibilities. These include striking Israeli and Jewish interests around the world; delegating responsibility for a response to the resistance axis, particularly Hizbullah and the Houthis; and leveraging the threat of a direct Iranian attack on Israel in negotiations with the U.S. with the aim of extracting Iranian nuclear achievements, securing the lifting of economic sanctions, and obtaining a withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region. A. Savyon is director of the Iran Media Studies project and N. Katirachi is a research fellow at MEMRI. 2024-08-13 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Seeks Safest Revenge Against Israel for Minimum Cost and Maximum Benefit
(MEMRI) A. Savyon and N. Katirachi - Tehran may not launch hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel as it did in April because it fears a harsh Israeli response. Instead, it favors vengeance by means of its proxies, while extracting as much as it can from the Americans and Europeans in exchange for not going to war against Israel. According to reports, discussions in Iran's security leadership raised additional possibilities. These include striking Israeli and Jewish interests around the world; delegating responsibility for a response to the resistance axis, particularly Hizbullah and the Houthis; and leveraging the threat of a direct Iranian attack on Israel in negotiations with the U.S. with the aim of extracting Iranian nuclear achievements, securing the lifting of economic sanctions, and obtaining a withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region. A. Savyon is director of the Iran Media Studies project and N. Katirachi is a research fellow at MEMRI. 2024-08-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|