Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Spectator-UK) Jonathan Spyer - Negotiations for an end to the war in Gaza are floundering on substantive gaps between the two sides, reflecting their diametrically opposed goals for the outcome of the war. Hamas wants a deal which it can (plausibly) portray as a victory, one that includes a total withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, an Israeli commitment to a permanent ceasefire, and an absence of any clear commitment regarding future political arrangements and governance, enabling the restoration and rebuilding of Hamas authority. The achievement of these core demands would be accompanied by the release of thousands of Palestinian terrorists from Israeli jails in return for Israeli hostages. The individuals released would include people with the blood of many Israeli civilians on their hands and would be presented as paving the way for the next phase of the struggle against Israel. Should Israel accept such a deal, it would have failed to have achieved its core stated goal of dismantling Hamas authority in Gaza. More fundamentally, Hamas would have proved the basic point of its Oct. 7 attack, that to achieve strategic goals against Israel, it is necessary to strike directly at the civilian population by taking, holding, and subsequently negotiating the release of civilian hostages. For both Israel and Hamas, the differences in their core demands constitute the gap between victory and defeat. 2024-08-22 00:00:00Full Article
Netanyahu Won't Hand Hamas an Easy Victory
(Spectator-UK) Jonathan Spyer - Negotiations for an end to the war in Gaza are floundering on substantive gaps between the two sides, reflecting their diametrically opposed goals for the outcome of the war. Hamas wants a deal which it can (plausibly) portray as a victory, one that includes a total withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, an Israeli commitment to a permanent ceasefire, and an absence of any clear commitment regarding future political arrangements and governance, enabling the restoration and rebuilding of Hamas authority. The achievement of these core demands would be accompanied by the release of thousands of Palestinian terrorists from Israeli jails in return for Israeli hostages. The individuals released would include people with the blood of many Israeli civilians on their hands and would be presented as paving the way for the next phase of the struggle against Israel. Should Israel accept such a deal, it would have failed to have achieved its core stated goal of dismantling Hamas authority in Gaza. More fundamentally, Hamas would have proved the basic point of its Oct. 7 attack, that to achieve strategic goals against Israel, it is necessary to strike directly at the civilian population by taking, holding, and subsequently negotiating the release of civilian hostages. For both Israel and Hamas, the differences in their core demands constitute the gap between victory and defeat. 2024-08-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|