Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Efraim Inbar - There is a moral obligation to return hostages. Ransom for hostages is a "great commandment." However, it is not an absolute command. The Mishnah teaches that "we do not redeem captives for more than their worth due to the repair of the world: so that [their captors] do not strive to increase the number of captives" (Tractate Gittin, Mishnah 4:6). The ransom for the hostages should not be excessive: this was also determined by a committee headed by Supreme Court Justice Meir Shamgar. While setting a reasonable price is subject to debate, the principle is correct. The moral calculation must include the fact that releasing an unknown number of terrorists in exchange for some of the hostages poses a tangible danger to Israeli citizens. The more than a thousand released in the Shalit deal - including Sinwar himself - are responsible for the deaths of many Israelis. Is the blood of Israeli citizens who have been or will be killed due to released terrorists considered any less red? The writer is president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security. 2024-08-22 00:00:00Full Article
The Emerging Hostage Deal Is Problematic from a Moral Standpoint
(Jerusalem Post) Efraim Inbar - There is a moral obligation to return hostages. Ransom for hostages is a "great commandment." However, it is not an absolute command. The Mishnah teaches that "we do not redeem captives for more than their worth due to the repair of the world: so that [their captors] do not strive to increase the number of captives" (Tractate Gittin, Mishnah 4:6). The ransom for the hostages should not be excessive: this was also determined by a committee headed by Supreme Court Justice Meir Shamgar. While setting a reasonable price is subject to debate, the principle is correct. The moral calculation must include the fact that releasing an unknown number of terrorists in exchange for some of the hostages poses a tangible danger to Israeli citizens. The more than a thousand released in the Shalit deal - including Sinwar himself - are responsible for the deaths of many Israelis. Is the blood of Israeli citizens who have been or will be killed due to released terrorists considered any less red? The writer is president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security. 2024-08-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|