Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security) Col. (res.) Prof. Gabi Siboni - At the beginning of the war, some in the Israeli defense establishment and government sought to avoid a ground maneuver in Gaza. Similar advice was offered by American officials who frequented Israel. Their reasons for this hesitation were primarily due to doubts over the ability of ground forces to operate effectively in Gaza's complex environment. Another factor prolonging the conflict - one that is still in play - is the issue of humanitarian aid. From the start, Israel faced intense American pressure to transfer humanitarian aid and fuel to Gaza, despite knowing that much of it would reach Hamas and enhance its ability to survive. This undermined one of Israel's key leverage points to obtain the return of the hostages, and prolonged Hamas's military and civilian survivability. Hamas's control over humanitarian aid gives it breathing room and maintains its influence and power among the population. An additional factor contributing to the prolonged conflict is the hostage issue. The IDF has acted cautiously throughout the conflict and continues to do so to avoid harming the hostages. A delay of some four months was caused by American and international pressure to avoid operations in Rafah and the Philadelphi Corridor, primarily by concerns over harm to civilians and actions that could hinder potential hostage negotiations. It now seems clear that these concerns were in fact an excuse by the U.S. and elements in the international community to impose a ceasefire on Israel. Precious time was lost before the IDF began operations in this area under a format acceptable to Washington. The writer was director of the military and strategic affairs program of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) from 2006-2020. 2024-08-29 00:00:00Full Article
Why Is It Taking So Long to Destroy Hamas?
(Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security) Col. (res.) Prof. Gabi Siboni - At the beginning of the war, some in the Israeli defense establishment and government sought to avoid a ground maneuver in Gaza. Similar advice was offered by American officials who frequented Israel. Their reasons for this hesitation were primarily due to doubts over the ability of ground forces to operate effectively in Gaza's complex environment. Another factor prolonging the conflict - one that is still in play - is the issue of humanitarian aid. From the start, Israel faced intense American pressure to transfer humanitarian aid and fuel to Gaza, despite knowing that much of it would reach Hamas and enhance its ability to survive. This undermined one of Israel's key leverage points to obtain the return of the hostages, and prolonged Hamas's military and civilian survivability. Hamas's control over humanitarian aid gives it breathing room and maintains its influence and power among the population. An additional factor contributing to the prolonged conflict is the hostage issue. The IDF has acted cautiously throughout the conflict and continues to do so to avoid harming the hostages. A delay of some four months was caused by American and international pressure to avoid operations in Rafah and the Philadelphi Corridor, primarily by concerns over harm to civilians and actions that could hinder potential hostage negotiations. It now seems clear that these concerns were in fact an excuse by the U.S. and elements in the international community to impose a ceasefire on Israel. Precious time was lost before the IDF began operations in this area under a format acceptable to Washington. The writer was director of the military and strategic affairs program of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) from 2006-2020. 2024-08-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|