Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Atlantic) Hussein Ibish - Neither Iran nor Hizbullah has much to gain from a war with Israel in Lebanon, particularly one started on behalf of Hamas. For Iran, Hizbullah is a precious asset not to be wasted. Tehran sees the militia and its missiles as its prime deterrent against an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities. To expend this capacity on Gaza would be irrational from an Iranian point of view. In addition, Sunni Hamas isn't nearly as important to Iran as Shiite Hizbullah is. Hamas's inclusion in Shiite Iran's "axis of resistance" is a marriage of convenience. So why doesn't Hizbullah accept a sensible settlement, like the one the Biden administration has spent the past year negotiating? Hizbullah maintains that it must remain in south Lebanon to protect the border area. This is the rather flimsy basis on which the militia group has been permitted to maintain its own army. Any formal understanding that pulls Hizbullah back from the border threatens the rationale for its existence as an armed group within Lebanon. The writer is a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. 2024-09-22 00:00:00Full Article
Why Hizbullah and Israel Can't Make a Deal
(Atlantic) Hussein Ibish - Neither Iran nor Hizbullah has much to gain from a war with Israel in Lebanon, particularly one started on behalf of Hamas. For Iran, Hizbullah is a precious asset not to be wasted. Tehran sees the militia and its missiles as its prime deterrent against an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities. To expend this capacity on Gaza would be irrational from an Iranian point of view. In addition, Sunni Hamas isn't nearly as important to Iran as Shiite Hizbullah is. Hamas's inclusion in Shiite Iran's "axis of resistance" is a marriage of convenience. So why doesn't Hizbullah accept a sensible settlement, like the one the Biden administration has spent the past year negotiating? Hizbullah maintains that it must remain in south Lebanon to protect the border area. This is the rather flimsy basis on which the militia group has been permitted to maintain its own army. Any formal understanding that pulls Hizbullah back from the border threatens the rationale for its existence as an armed group within Lebanon. The writer is a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. 2024-09-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|