Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Dr. Irwin J. Mansdorf - There is a psychological asymmetry in fighting an Islamist opponent, which works against the stronger party. If Hizbullah survives, it can claim victory. And, just as for Hamas - its ideological twin in Gaza, sacrificing the lives of its people does not deter Hizbullah from continuing the fight. So how will psychological pressure work against those whose value system is such that conventional losses are computed on a scale different from what Western culture is used to? In an Islamist world, a belief system that stands against reality provides the fuel to continue. Unless the cost-benefit ratio of adhering to that ideology changes, Hizbullah will continue to fight and attack as long as it can - however it can. Yet, unlike Hamas in Gaza, Hizbullah faces real opposition within Lebanon. Alienating the non-Shiite population of Lebanon is not a Hizbullah interest. For an organization whose motivation stems from an unwavering ideology, conventional reality testing does not come easy, but history has taught that it nevertheless sets limits to its losses. We don't know what Hizbullah's breaking point will be, but Israel must continue to take steps that deepen the psychological effect on Lebanon. The writer is a senior fellow and analyst in political psychology at the Jerusalem Center for Foreign Affairs and a member of the Emergency Division of the IDF Home Front Command. 2024-09-24 00:00:00Full Article
The Hizbullah Beeper Attack: Israel's Psychological Warfare
(Jerusalem Post) Dr. Irwin J. Mansdorf - There is a psychological asymmetry in fighting an Islamist opponent, which works against the stronger party. If Hizbullah survives, it can claim victory. And, just as for Hamas - its ideological twin in Gaza, sacrificing the lives of its people does not deter Hizbullah from continuing the fight. So how will psychological pressure work against those whose value system is such that conventional losses are computed on a scale different from what Western culture is used to? In an Islamist world, a belief system that stands against reality provides the fuel to continue. Unless the cost-benefit ratio of adhering to that ideology changes, Hizbullah will continue to fight and attack as long as it can - however it can. Yet, unlike Hamas in Gaza, Hizbullah faces real opposition within Lebanon. Alienating the non-Shiite population of Lebanon is not a Hizbullah interest. For an organization whose motivation stems from an unwavering ideology, conventional reality testing does not come easy, but history has taught that it nevertheless sets limits to its losses. We don't know what Hizbullah's breaking point will be, but Israel must continue to take steps that deepen the psychological effect on Lebanon. The writer is a senior fellow and analyst in political psychology at the Jerusalem Center for Foreign Affairs and a member of the Emergency Division of the IDF Home Front Command. 2024-09-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|