Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Steven Erlanger - After a series of humiliations, heightened by Israel's intensified attacks on Hizbullah, Iran faces clear dilemmas. It wants to restore deterrence against Israel while avoiding a full-scale war that could draw in the U.S. and, in combination, destroy the Islamic Republic at home. It wants to preserve the proxies that provide what it calls forward defense against Israel - Hizbullah, Hamas and the Houthis in Yemen - without going into battle on their behalf. And it wants to get some of the punishing economic sanctions against it lifted by renewing nuclear negotiations with the West, while preserving its close military and trade relationships with Russia and China. Israel has seized an opportunity to destroy or diminish two Iranian proxies: Hamas and Hizbullah. Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert and director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution, said Hizbullah is "disinclined to engage in a conflict that is likely to lead to its own destruction....Its capabilities and proximity to Israel are the first line of defense for the Islamic Republic, and if it is destroyed, it leaves the Iranians significantly more vulnerable." 2024-09-26 00:00:00Full Article
Iran's Khamenei Wants to Avoid a Larger Regional War
(New York Times) Steven Erlanger - After a series of humiliations, heightened by Israel's intensified attacks on Hizbullah, Iran faces clear dilemmas. It wants to restore deterrence against Israel while avoiding a full-scale war that could draw in the U.S. and, in combination, destroy the Islamic Republic at home. It wants to preserve the proxies that provide what it calls forward defense against Israel - Hizbullah, Hamas and the Houthis in Yemen - without going into battle on their behalf. And it wants to get some of the punishing economic sanctions against it lifted by renewing nuclear negotiations with the West, while preserving its close military and trade relationships with Russia and China. Israel has seized an opportunity to destroy or diminish two Iranian proxies: Hamas and Hizbullah. Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert and director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution, said Hizbullah is "disinclined to engage in a conflict that is likely to lead to its own destruction....Its capabilities and proximity to Israel are the first line of defense for the Islamic Republic, and if it is destroyed, it leaves the Iranians significantly more vulnerable." 2024-09-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|