Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Affairs) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - It is hard to have an objective, fact-based debate about Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza when the debaters have no shared definition of war. When I teach students about wars, I highlight that wars always have both underlying causes and triggering events. World War I and World War II, for example, had clear underlying causes, triggering events, and start and finish dates. But not all conflicts are so cut-and-dried; some can go on for decades, with multiple wars waged as underlying problems remain unresolved. The current war between Israel and Hamas is one such example of a discrete war within a wider conflict. The Hamas invasion of Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, was the triggering event; the underlying problems include a complex history over land ownership, sovereignty, and rights, as well as Hamas's radical belief that Israel should not exist. But there was no justification for Hamas's actions. The day before, a ceasefire had been in place between Hamas and Israel. Hamas broke that ceasefire. I have visited Gaza three times since Oct. 7. My analysis of the war is based on what I saw, not on Israeli statements, Hamas's statements, or videos on social media. I observed both IDF operations and Hamas activities in Gaza firsthand. I witnessed the IDF taking extraordinary steps to mitigate civilian harm and imposing restraints on the use of force as it undertook what may be the greatest urban warfare challenge in modern history. I saw the IDF tracking the movement of civilians and handing out maps to facilitate localized evacuations, pausing the fighting every day for hours at a time to allow civilians to get out of harm's way and humanitarian aid to be delivered, and in many cases not permitting operations in areas where civilians were present. I also saw Hamas's cruel use of Gazans as human shields; the tunnels the group built under civilian homes, mosques, and schools; and the militants' complete lack of care for civilian life. Hamas did not say it conducted the Oct. 7 attacks to advance self-determination, human rights, or prosperity for the Palestinian people. The group's stated goal was to destroy the nation of Israel and kill all the Jewish people within it, and none of its actions since suggest it has other objectives in mind. Hamas seized power in Gaza in 2007 and started attacking Israel in 2008. The only way to break the cycle of violence and radicalization in Gaza is for Israel to continue, through legal and methodical means, to remove Hamas from military and political power. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point.2024-11-19 00:00:00Full Article
Can the War in Gaza Be Won?
(Foreign Affairs) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - It is hard to have an objective, fact-based debate about Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza when the debaters have no shared definition of war. When I teach students about wars, I highlight that wars always have both underlying causes and triggering events. World War I and World War II, for example, had clear underlying causes, triggering events, and start and finish dates. But not all conflicts are so cut-and-dried; some can go on for decades, with multiple wars waged as underlying problems remain unresolved. The current war between Israel and Hamas is one such example of a discrete war within a wider conflict. The Hamas invasion of Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, was the triggering event; the underlying problems include a complex history over land ownership, sovereignty, and rights, as well as Hamas's radical belief that Israel should not exist. But there was no justification for Hamas's actions. The day before, a ceasefire had been in place between Hamas and Israel. Hamas broke that ceasefire. I have visited Gaza three times since Oct. 7. My analysis of the war is based on what I saw, not on Israeli statements, Hamas's statements, or videos on social media. I observed both IDF operations and Hamas activities in Gaza firsthand. I witnessed the IDF taking extraordinary steps to mitigate civilian harm and imposing restraints on the use of force as it undertook what may be the greatest urban warfare challenge in modern history. I saw the IDF tracking the movement of civilians and handing out maps to facilitate localized evacuations, pausing the fighting every day for hours at a time to allow civilians to get out of harm's way and humanitarian aid to be delivered, and in many cases not permitting operations in areas where civilians were present. I also saw Hamas's cruel use of Gazans as human shields; the tunnels the group built under civilian homes, mosques, and schools; and the militants' complete lack of care for civilian life. Hamas did not say it conducted the Oct. 7 attacks to advance self-determination, human rights, or prosperity for the Palestinian people. The group's stated goal was to destroy the nation of Israel and kill all the Jewish people within it, and none of its actions since suggest it has other objectives in mind. Hamas seized power in Gaza in 2007 and started attacking Israel in 2008. The only way to break the cycle of violence and radicalization in Gaza is for Israel to continue, through legal and methodical means, to remove Hamas from military and political power. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point.2024-11-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|