Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Jakub Grygiel - When our enemies' advances cause a massive disequilibrium, then it's in America's interest to back our allies and let them take the necessary risks to restore stability. We often do the opposite. We restrain them when they are attacked - with dire consequences. In the Middle East, Iranian proxies have escalated dramatically, with Hamas's attack on Israel last year, the Houthis targeting shipping vital to global trade, and Iran striking Israel with the largest single ballistic missile attack in history. The Biden approach to this mayhem has been to constrain our allies' defensive responses in the name of "escalation management." Restraining U.S. allies when they're responding to the aggression of our common enemies is ineffective and counterproductive. Equilibrium won't be restored unless the aggressor is pushed back. By telling Israel while it's under attack to limit its responses and not to strike too hard at the enemy, a new equilibrium may be achieved, but it will be more beneficial to the attacker, encouraging further aggression and war. So far, Israel has been successful in destroying Hamas and decapitating Hizbullah because it has ignored the Biden calls not to strike too hard and to negotiate with the two groups. Israel chose not to be constrained by Washington and is succeeding. The best geopolitical asset we have is our allies. When the frontier is on fire, Washington should unleash our allies that want to defend themselves and thus restore a beneficial equilibrium in their region. The writer is a professor of politics at the Catholic University of America and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. 2024-11-21 00:00:00Full Article
America's Approach to Its Allies Is Backward
(Wall Street Journal) Jakub Grygiel - When our enemies' advances cause a massive disequilibrium, then it's in America's interest to back our allies and let them take the necessary risks to restore stability. We often do the opposite. We restrain them when they are attacked - with dire consequences. In the Middle East, Iranian proxies have escalated dramatically, with Hamas's attack on Israel last year, the Houthis targeting shipping vital to global trade, and Iran striking Israel with the largest single ballistic missile attack in history. The Biden approach to this mayhem has been to constrain our allies' defensive responses in the name of "escalation management." Restraining U.S. allies when they're responding to the aggression of our common enemies is ineffective and counterproductive. Equilibrium won't be restored unless the aggressor is pushed back. By telling Israel while it's under attack to limit its responses and not to strike too hard at the enemy, a new equilibrium may be achieved, but it will be more beneficial to the attacker, encouraging further aggression and war. So far, Israel has been successful in destroying Hamas and decapitating Hizbullah because it has ignored the Biden calls not to strike too hard and to negotiate with the two groups. Israel chose not to be constrained by Washington and is succeeding. The best geopolitical asset we have is our allies. When the frontier is on fire, Washington should unleash our allies that want to defend themselves and thus restore a beneficial equilibrium in their region. The writer is a professor of politics at the Catholic University of America and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. 2024-11-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|