Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(X) Orde F. Kittrie - There is no factual or legal basis for the ICC warrants against top Israeli officials. The warrants are clearly driven by politics and the same anti-Israel animus that has long dominated the UN and other international organizations. These filings should be treated as lawfare, a political vendetta masquerading as a legal proceeding. The ICC has not issued arrest warrants for the Islamic Republic of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The ICC has only concocted a specious jurisdiction claim for Israel, in an outrageous abuse of power. Since the ICC's founding in 2002, every U.S. administration, of both parties, has refused to join the court, fearing the ICC's politicization and misuse. Both the Biden and Trump administrations and over 330 Members of Congress from both parties have rejected ICC investigations of the U.S. and Israel in the past. NSC Spokesperson John Kirby said on April 30, "We don't believe the ICC has any jurisdiction here." The ICC warrants for Israeli leaders threaten U.S. national security. The warrants set a dangerous precedent for U.S. officials and troops. The ICC has an open investigation of alleged U.S. war crimes relating to Afghanistan. That Afghanistan investigation could lead to the arrest, prosecution, and detention of American military personnel and veterans in foreign countries. The ICC is largely funded by key American allies whose security depends on U.S. troops. By funding the ICC's legally and factually baseless attack on Israel, these allies weaken American security and put at risk the very U.S. troops that defend those key allies. Congress should urge those key allies to use their leverage to halt these outrageous warrants. 2/3 of the ICC budget is provided by Japan, Germany, France, UK, Italy, and South Korea. The writer, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, is a law professor at Arizona State University. 2024-11-26 00:00:00Full Article
The ICC Warrants for Israeli Leaders Threaten U.S. National Security
(X) Orde F. Kittrie - There is no factual or legal basis for the ICC warrants against top Israeli officials. The warrants are clearly driven by politics and the same anti-Israel animus that has long dominated the UN and other international organizations. These filings should be treated as lawfare, a political vendetta masquerading as a legal proceeding. The ICC has not issued arrest warrants for the Islamic Republic of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The ICC has only concocted a specious jurisdiction claim for Israel, in an outrageous abuse of power. Since the ICC's founding in 2002, every U.S. administration, of both parties, has refused to join the court, fearing the ICC's politicization and misuse. Both the Biden and Trump administrations and over 330 Members of Congress from both parties have rejected ICC investigations of the U.S. and Israel in the past. NSC Spokesperson John Kirby said on April 30, "We don't believe the ICC has any jurisdiction here." The ICC warrants for Israeli leaders threaten U.S. national security. The warrants set a dangerous precedent for U.S. officials and troops. The ICC has an open investigation of alleged U.S. war crimes relating to Afghanistan. That Afghanistan investigation could lead to the arrest, prosecution, and detention of American military personnel and veterans in foreign countries. The ICC is largely funded by key American allies whose security depends on U.S. troops. By funding the ICC's legally and factually baseless attack on Israel, these allies weaken American security and put at risk the very U.S. troops that defend those key allies. Congress should urge those key allies to use their leverage to halt these outrageous warrants. 2/3 of the ICC budget is provided by Japan, Germany, France, UK, Italy, and South Korea. The writer, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, is a law professor at Arizona State University. 2024-11-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|