Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Ben Hubbard - For years, Hizbullah told the Lebanese that it alone could defend them from Israel. It boasted of powerful weapons and hardened commandos who would unleash deadly "surprises" if war broke out. And it assured its followers that a regional alliance of militias supported by Iran would jump in to support it in battle. Those myths have now been shattered. After 13 months of war, Hizbullah entered a ceasefire with Israel on Wednesday after three months of withering Israeli attacks that have thrown the organization into disarray. At the height of its power before the war, Hizbullah was perceived to be such a military threat that Israel and the U.S. feared that a war with it could devastate Israel. But as the war escalated, Israel stepped up its attacks so fast that Hizbullah found itself unable to mount a response close to what it had threatened for years. Hizbullah's presence on Israel's border also deterred Israel from attacking Iran, because of fears that Hizbullah would bombard Israel in response. That threat has been drastically reduced, depriving Iran of a key defense. "Israel can attack Iran at will and Iran cannot do the same," said Paul Salem, a Lebanon expert at the Middle East Institute. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
A Battered and Diminished Hizbullah Accepts a Ceasefire
(New York Times) Ben Hubbard - For years, Hizbullah told the Lebanese that it alone could defend them from Israel. It boasted of powerful weapons and hardened commandos who would unleash deadly "surprises" if war broke out. And it assured its followers that a regional alliance of militias supported by Iran would jump in to support it in battle. Those myths have now been shattered. After 13 months of war, Hizbullah entered a ceasefire with Israel on Wednesday after three months of withering Israeli attacks that have thrown the organization into disarray. At the height of its power before the war, Hizbullah was perceived to be such a military threat that Israel and the U.S. feared that a war with it could devastate Israel. But as the war escalated, Israel stepped up its attacks so fast that Hizbullah found itself unable to mount a response close to what it had threatened for years. Hizbullah's presence on Israel's border also deterred Israel from attacking Iran, because of fears that Hizbullah would bombard Israel in response. That threat has been drastically reduced, depriving Iran of a key defense. "Israel can attack Iran at will and Iran cannot do the same," said Paul Salem, a Lebanon expert at the Middle East Institute. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|