Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Sydney Morning Herald-Australia) Dr. Rodger Shanahan - Hizbullah has been dealt a grievous blow and paid a heavy price for its continuing support for the Palestinian cause in Gaza. By tying any ceasefire agreement in Lebanon to a ceasefire in Gaza, Hizbullah and Iran bet that it could pressure Israel on a second front without Israel fighting on a second front. They miscalculated. Israel has forced Hizbullah and Iran to decouple their fight with Israel from the conflict in Gaza. As a result, Hizbullah's leadership has been decimated and its weapons stockpiles have been greatly reduced. Moreover, Israel's ability to target its senior leadership and to introduce booby-trapped pagers into its supply chain showed that Hizbullah was deeply penetrated by Israeli intelligence. Yet, the idea that Hizbullah will withdraw to north of the Litani River and take its weapons with it while the Lebanese military protects the border with Israel ignores the fact that much of Hizbullah actually lives south of the Litani River and will simply return to their homes and rebuild. Hizbullah will claim that it fought to the end and was still launching dozens of rockets into Israel until the ceasefire. It will now focus on reconstituting its military wing and reinforcing its support base by rebuilding that which Israel destroyed, with Iranian money. No one can deny that achieving a ceasefire is a good thing. But the reality is that this is simply likely to be another, albeit extended, operational pause in the ongoing conflict between Israel and its enemies in the region. Israel won the tactical battle in Lebanon, but the strategic realities haven't changed. The writer, a former Australian army officer who served with the UN in South Lebanon and Syria, in Beirut during the 2006 war, and in Afghanistan, was former director of the Army's Land Warfare Studies Centre. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Israel Won the Tactical Battle in Lebanon, but Hizbullah Will Use Ceasefire to Rebuild
(Sydney Morning Herald-Australia) Dr. Rodger Shanahan - Hizbullah has been dealt a grievous blow and paid a heavy price for its continuing support for the Palestinian cause in Gaza. By tying any ceasefire agreement in Lebanon to a ceasefire in Gaza, Hizbullah and Iran bet that it could pressure Israel on a second front without Israel fighting on a second front. They miscalculated. Israel has forced Hizbullah and Iran to decouple their fight with Israel from the conflict in Gaza. As a result, Hizbullah's leadership has been decimated and its weapons stockpiles have been greatly reduced. Moreover, Israel's ability to target its senior leadership and to introduce booby-trapped pagers into its supply chain showed that Hizbullah was deeply penetrated by Israeli intelligence. Yet, the idea that Hizbullah will withdraw to north of the Litani River and take its weapons with it while the Lebanese military protects the border with Israel ignores the fact that much of Hizbullah actually lives south of the Litani River and will simply return to their homes and rebuild. Hizbullah will claim that it fought to the end and was still launching dozens of rockets into Israel until the ceasefire. It will now focus on reconstituting its military wing and reinforcing its support base by rebuilding that which Israel destroyed, with Iranian money. No one can deny that achieving a ceasefire is a good thing. But the reality is that this is simply likely to be another, albeit extended, operational pause in the ongoing conflict between Israel and its enemies in the region. Israel won the tactical battle in Lebanon, but the strategic realities haven't changed. The writer, a former Australian army officer who served with the UN in South Lebanon and Syria, in Beirut during the 2006 war, and in Afghanistan, was former director of the Army's Land Warfare Studies Centre. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|