Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Spectator-UK) Jonathan Spyer - With the announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah, community leaders in Israel's north have noted that while Hizbullah's infrastructure along the border has been extensively damaged, the movement itself has not been destroyed. The proposed agreement also does not include a buffer zone. However, two new elements are included in the ceasefire agreement. The first is a U.S.-led enforcement committee, which will oversee the process. The second is a letter from the U.S. to Israel endorsing Jerusalem's right to take action against rocket and missile launches, and to interdict efforts to supply Hizbullah from Syria. Are these elements likely to make a decisive difference? It can be said with near certainty that the Lebanese Army, heavily infiltrated by officers and soldiers with links to Hizbullah, and UNIFIL will not succeed in preventing Hizbullah's re-establishment along the border. After the 2006 war, Hizbullah's grip was firmly reimposed as soon as the fighting ended. To be sure, Hizbullah is vastly more damaged now than after the 2006 war. Its entire top leadership cadre has been wiped out and the second rank has been decimated. The reconstruction process will begin from a substantially lower point than last time around. Yet, Lebanon is still host to an Iran-implanted deep state that is much stronger than the official bodies of state. This means that residents of Israel's north are indeed set once again to have Hizbullah as their neighbors, though the organization will be weakened and chastened, at least for a while. This means that a further round of fighting is a near inevitability. Hizbullah is the owner of Lebanon. Iran is the owner of Hizbullah. The writer is director of research at the Middle East Forum. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
A Ceasefire Deal Won't Finish Off Hizbullah
(Spectator-UK) Jonathan Spyer - With the announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah, community leaders in Israel's north have noted that while Hizbullah's infrastructure along the border has been extensively damaged, the movement itself has not been destroyed. The proposed agreement also does not include a buffer zone. However, two new elements are included in the ceasefire agreement. The first is a U.S.-led enforcement committee, which will oversee the process. The second is a letter from the U.S. to Israel endorsing Jerusalem's right to take action against rocket and missile launches, and to interdict efforts to supply Hizbullah from Syria. Are these elements likely to make a decisive difference? It can be said with near certainty that the Lebanese Army, heavily infiltrated by officers and soldiers with links to Hizbullah, and UNIFIL will not succeed in preventing Hizbullah's re-establishment along the border. After the 2006 war, Hizbullah's grip was firmly reimposed as soon as the fighting ended. To be sure, Hizbullah is vastly more damaged now than after the 2006 war. Its entire top leadership cadre has been wiped out and the second rank has been decimated. The reconstruction process will begin from a substantially lower point than last time around. Yet, Lebanon is still host to an Iran-implanted deep state that is much stronger than the official bodies of state. This means that residents of Israel's north are indeed set once again to have Hizbullah as their neighbors, though the organization will be weakened and chastened, at least for a while. This means that a further round of fighting is a near inevitability. Hizbullah is the owner of Lebanon. Iran is the owner of Hizbullah. The writer is director of research at the Middle East Forum. 2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|