Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Zvi Bar'el - Under the ceasefire agreement, Hizbullah won't be disarmed. Its thousands of long-range and short-range missiles, its arsenal of drones, its advanced ballistic technology and all its other military infrastructure will continue to exist. If the agreement is implemented in full, Hizbullah will move farther away from Israel, north of the Litani River. But it won't disappear. Moreover, southern Lebanon won't remain empty of its inhabitants like a buffer zone, even though Israel has destroyed numerous villages near the border. As far as the Lebanese government is concerned, the residents who were displaced or fled their villages will return home. While 15,000 Lebanese army soldiers alongside UNIFIL troops are to be deployed in the area between the Litani River and the Israeli border, the weak Lebanese army is incapable of confronting Hizbullah's military strength. In Lebanon, Hizbullah is an integral part of the government and parliament and represents the Shi'ite majority. Unofficially, it has received the status of a "defense force" necessary for national security for as long as the Lebanese army in incapable of handling external threats. Lebanon's government, which has been a temporary transition government for the past three years, is at most the mediator between Israel and Hizbullah, and its signature on the agreement is meant to grant it a legitimate formal framework. Iran is a full partner in the agreement. Without the strategic decision made in Tehran that allowed the separation between the fronts in Gaza and Lebanon, and which, in practice, broke up the unity of the "support front" for Hamas, the negotiations over the agreement may never have moved forward. The fear of the loss of their asset in Lebanon seems to have tipped the balance.2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Permitted Lebanon Ceasefire to Protect Hizbullah
(Ha'aretz) Zvi Bar'el - Under the ceasefire agreement, Hizbullah won't be disarmed. Its thousands of long-range and short-range missiles, its arsenal of drones, its advanced ballistic technology and all its other military infrastructure will continue to exist. If the agreement is implemented in full, Hizbullah will move farther away from Israel, north of the Litani River. But it won't disappear. Moreover, southern Lebanon won't remain empty of its inhabitants like a buffer zone, even though Israel has destroyed numerous villages near the border. As far as the Lebanese government is concerned, the residents who were displaced or fled their villages will return home. While 15,000 Lebanese army soldiers alongside UNIFIL troops are to be deployed in the area between the Litani River and the Israeli border, the weak Lebanese army is incapable of confronting Hizbullah's military strength. In Lebanon, Hizbullah is an integral part of the government and parliament and represents the Shi'ite majority. Unofficially, it has received the status of a "defense force" necessary for national security for as long as the Lebanese army in incapable of handling external threats. Lebanon's government, which has been a temporary transition government for the past three years, is at most the mediator between Israel and Hizbullah, and its signature on the agreement is meant to grant it a legitimate formal framework. Iran is a full partner in the agreement. Without the strategic decision made in Tehran that allowed the separation between the fronts in Gaza and Lebanon, and which, in practice, broke up the unity of the "support front" for Hamas, the negotiations over the agreement may never have moved forward. The fear of the loss of their asset in Lebanon seems to have tipped the balance.2024-11-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|