Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Lt.-Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch - In order to issue arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, the International Criminal Court first had to admit an entity - the "State of Palestine" - that is not a real state. Then the court had to act beyond its legal power or authority and decide on the borders of the nonexistent state. The ICC prosecutor then needed to act on the baseless complaints of the Palestinians and adopt the narrative of the terrorists who led the Oct. 7 massacre and their supporters. The ICC was created to allay fears that the punishment of war criminals would be dependent, as had historically been the case, on which side won the war. The neutrality of the court stands at its very core. The court's repeated decisions to acquiesce to the Palestinian political weaponization of the court against Israel is a fundamental breach of the court's reason for being. The writer, Director of the Palestinian Authority Accountability Initiative at the Jerusalem Center for Foreign Affairs, was director of the Military Prosecution in Judea and Samaria. 2024-12-03 00:00:00Full Article
How Palestinian Manipulation and ICC Bias Led to Arrest Warrants for Israeli Leaders
(Jerusalem Post) Lt.-Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch - In order to issue arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, the International Criminal Court first had to admit an entity - the "State of Palestine" - that is not a real state. Then the court had to act beyond its legal power or authority and decide on the borders of the nonexistent state. The ICC prosecutor then needed to act on the baseless complaints of the Palestinians and adopt the narrative of the terrorists who led the Oct. 7 massacre and their supporters. The ICC was created to allay fears that the punishment of war criminals would be dependent, as had historically been the case, on which side won the war. The neutrality of the court stands at its very core. The court's repeated decisions to acquiesce to the Palestinian political weaponization of the court against Israel is a fundamental breach of the court's reason for being. The writer, Director of the Palestinian Authority Accountability Initiative at the Jerusalem Center for Foreign Affairs, was director of the Military Prosecution in Judea and Samaria. 2024-12-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|