Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Quillette) Gerald M. Steinberg - More than 250 captives were seized from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Not one of the Israeli abductees received a visit from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the organization ostensibly responsible for implementing the requirements of the Geneva Convention. The Red Cross did not provide a shred of information to the families regarding the condition of the captives because, as its own official statements blandly insist, without the agreement of Hamas, "the ICRC cannot act." This is technically correct, but the problem is that the ICRC was largely passive and failed to use its vast prestige to demand access to the hostages or campaign for their release. Red Cross officials failed to press Hamas to follow basic humanitarian and legal principles on the treatment of its "prisoners." In 2024, the ICRC in Israel sent only seven tweets that mentioned the Israelis out of hundreds of posts. The Red Cross response to the hostages and the Gaza war closely parallels the organization's inaction and excuses during the Holocaust. Like the victims languishing in the Nazis' concentration camps, the Israeli hostages languishing in Gaza became non-persons - neither seen nor heard in the ICRC's actions and public campaigns. Regarding Israelis, the ICRC's policy of neutrality is a one-way street. The ICRC has repeatedly and vocally joined the intense political campaigns led by UN agencies and allied NGOs which portray Israel's counterterrorism in Gaza as egregious violations of international law. Its posts on Instagram include dozens of condemnations of "the limitless destruction of Gaza" and of the IDF's "evacuation orders" to safe havens outside the areas of combat. The ICRC repeatedly condemned Israeli military actions involving hospitals and clinics in Gaza, but said nothing about the extensive exploitation of these facilities by Hamas. ICRC personnel on the ground in Gaza were aware of the thousands of rockets used to strike Israeli population centers. Each of these attacks on Israel was a war crime. But the Red Cross reported nothing. The writer is founder and president of NGO Monitor and professor emeritus of political studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2025-01-30 00:00:00Full Article
Hamas and the Red Cross
(Quillette) Gerald M. Steinberg - More than 250 captives were seized from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Not one of the Israeli abductees received a visit from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the organization ostensibly responsible for implementing the requirements of the Geneva Convention. The Red Cross did not provide a shred of information to the families regarding the condition of the captives because, as its own official statements blandly insist, without the agreement of Hamas, "the ICRC cannot act." This is technically correct, but the problem is that the ICRC was largely passive and failed to use its vast prestige to demand access to the hostages or campaign for their release. Red Cross officials failed to press Hamas to follow basic humanitarian and legal principles on the treatment of its "prisoners." In 2024, the ICRC in Israel sent only seven tweets that mentioned the Israelis out of hundreds of posts. The Red Cross response to the hostages and the Gaza war closely parallels the organization's inaction and excuses during the Holocaust. Like the victims languishing in the Nazis' concentration camps, the Israeli hostages languishing in Gaza became non-persons - neither seen nor heard in the ICRC's actions and public campaigns. Regarding Israelis, the ICRC's policy of neutrality is a one-way street. The ICRC has repeatedly and vocally joined the intense political campaigns led by UN agencies and allied NGOs which portray Israel's counterterrorism in Gaza as egregious violations of international law. Its posts on Instagram include dozens of condemnations of "the limitless destruction of Gaza" and of the IDF's "evacuation orders" to safe havens outside the areas of combat. The ICRC repeatedly condemned Israeli military actions involving hospitals and clinics in Gaza, but said nothing about the extensive exploitation of these facilities by Hamas. ICRC personnel on the ground in Gaza were aware of the thousands of rockets used to strike Israeli population centers. Each of these attacks on Israel was a war crime. But the Red Cross reported nothing. The writer is founder and president of NGO Monitor and professor emeritus of political studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2025-01-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|