Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[bitterlemons.org] Uzi Arad - Progress with the Palestinians can be accomplished only within that space that realistically allows for it. To seek progress beyond what is feasible would be an exercise in futility; not to seize opportunities wherever these present themselves would be equally wrong. This practical approach stands in contrast to the recent ambitious, indeed blatantly impossible, effort to accomplish a final status agreement within a year. By all accounts, the political terrain is simply not ripe for closure on a final status agreement. When it comes to Jerusalem, the very thought of taking a city that is currently united and amputating any part of it as a throwback to the long defunct status quo ante would be a severe failure of imagination as well as contrary to the Israeli and Jewish ethos. As for the refugees issue, not only should there be zero Palestinian return to Israel, but it is also necessary that the principle of fairness be applied when compensation is considered. Just as Arab Palestinians could be compensated, so should Jewish refugees from Arab lands. Political dialogue should certainly continue between Palestinians and Israelis because there are a number of issues pertaining to civilian or even security areas which need to be addressed and improved. Institution-building within the PA should be encouraged and the role of the PA's law enforcement and police forces should be further advanced. However, it is only realistic to assume that the burden of security responsibility to fight terror would remain in Israeli hands. The single most urgent and important area that necessitates progress is neither the Palestinian nor the Syrian track, but that of neutralizing the Iranian threat. The more menacing Iran is, the stronger its surrogates, Hamas and Hizbullah, and the more distant the possibility of peacefully resolving Arab-Israel issues. The writer, director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at IDC, Herzliya, served for many years in the Mossad, where his last position was director of intelligence. 2008-11-26 01:00:00Full Article
Progress with the Palestinians: Doing What Is Doable
[bitterlemons.org] Uzi Arad - Progress with the Palestinians can be accomplished only within that space that realistically allows for it. To seek progress beyond what is feasible would be an exercise in futility; not to seize opportunities wherever these present themselves would be equally wrong. This practical approach stands in contrast to the recent ambitious, indeed blatantly impossible, effort to accomplish a final status agreement within a year. By all accounts, the political terrain is simply not ripe for closure on a final status agreement. When it comes to Jerusalem, the very thought of taking a city that is currently united and amputating any part of it as a throwback to the long defunct status quo ante would be a severe failure of imagination as well as contrary to the Israeli and Jewish ethos. As for the refugees issue, not only should there be zero Palestinian return to Israel, but it is also necessary that the principle of fairness be applied when compensation is considered. Just as Arab Palestinians could be compensated, so should Jewish refugees from Arab lands. Political dialogue should certainly continue between Palestinians and Israelis because there are a number of issues pertaining to civilian or even security areas which need to be addressed and improved. Institution-building within the PA should be encouraged and the role of the PA's law enforcement and police forces should be further advanced. However, it is only realistic to assume that the burden of security responsibility to fight terror would remain in Israeli hands. The single most urgent and important area that necessitates progress is neither the Palestinian nor the Syrian track, but that of neutralizing the Iranian threat. The more menacing Iran is, the stronger its surrogates, Hamas and Hizbullah, and the more distant the possibility of peacefully resolving Arab-Israel issues. The writer, director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at IDC, Herzliya, served for many years in the Mossad, where his last position was director of intelligence. 2008-11-26 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|