Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Guardian-UK] Jonathan Steele - Israel gave serious thought this spring to launching a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites but was told by President Bush that he would not support it and did not expect to revise that view for the rest of his presidency, senior European diplomatic sources have told the Guardian. Bush's decision appeared to be based on two factors, the sources said. One was U.S. concern over Iran's likely retaliation, which would probably include a wave of attacks on U.S. military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as on shipping in the Persian Gulf. The other was U.S. anxiety that Israel would not succeed in disabling Iran's nuclear facilities in a single assault. It could not mount a series of attacks over several days without risking full-scale war. So the benefits would not outweigh the costs. Mark Regev, Olmert's spokesman, responded: "The need to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is raised at every meeting between the prime minister and foreign leaders. Israel prefers a diplomatic solution to this issue but all options must remain on the table." "Your unnamed European source attributed words to the prime minister that were not spoken in any working meeting with foreign guests." 2008-09-26 01:00:00Full Article
Report: Israel Sought U.S. Go-Ahead to Bomb Iran Nuclear Sites
[Guardian-UK] Jonathan Steele - Israel gave serious thought this spring to launching a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites but was told by President Bush that he would not support it and did not expect to revise that view for the rest of his presidency, senior European diplomatic sources have told the Guardian. Bush's decision appeared to be based on two factors, the sources said. One was U.S. concern over Iran's likely retaliation, which would probably include a wave of attacks on U.S. military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as on shipping in the Persian Gulf. The other was U.S. anxiety that Israel would not succeed in disabling Iran's nuclear facilities in a single assault. It could not mount a series of attacks over several days without risking full-scale war. So the benefits would not outweigh the costs. Mark Regev, Olmert's spokesman, responded: "The need to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is raised at every meeting between the prime minister and foreign leaders. Israel prefers a diplomatic solution to this issue but all options must remain on the table." "Your unnamed European source attributed words to the prime minister that were not spoken in any working meeting with foreign guests." 2008-09-26 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|