Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) David French - The necessity of stopping Iran's march to a bomb is far more clear today than it was three years ago. During that time, Russia invaded Ukraine and Hamas massacred Israeli civilians. The first event taught that when a nuclear-armed nation engages in armed aggression, the rest of the world's options narrow considerably. Now, imagine Iran with even a modest nuclear arsenal. It could use its arsenal to be relentlessly aggressive. Its nuclear weapons would constrain Israel's ability to defend itself. At the same time, Israel is living with the reality since Oct. 7, 2023, that its enemies will directly target civilians, massacre them on video and celebrate their deaths. Is there a sovereign nation on the planet that would permit its chief adversary - the primary military backer of its terrorist enemies - to possess the ultimate weapon of mass destruction?2025-06-16 00:00:00Full Article
Look at the Ukraine War to Understand Why Israel Struck Iran
(New York Times) David French - The necessity of stopping Iran's march to a bomb is far more clear today than it was three years ago. During that time, Russia invaded Ukraine and Hamas massacred Israeli civilians. The first event taught that when a nuclear-armed nation engages in armed aggression, the rest of the world's options narrow considerably. Now, imagine Iran with even a modest nuclear arsenal. It could use its arsenal to be relentlessly aggressive. Its nuclear weapons would constrain Israel's ability to defend itself. At the same time, Israel is living with the reality since Oct. 7, 2023, that its enemies will directly target civilians, massacre them on video and celebrate their deaths. Is there a sovereign nation on the planet that would permit its chief adversary - the primary military backer of its terrorist enemies - to possess the ultimate weapon of mass destruction?2025-06-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|