Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Robert Satloff - Iran's direct missile and drone attacks on Israel in 2024 represented a major strategic blunder for Iran, exposing its national assets and citizens to external attack for the first time since the Iran-Iraq War. The recent attack on Iran is a watershed for U.S. policy, redefining red lines for potential U.S. military action. Previously, there was friction between the U.S. and Israel over their respective thresholds for military operations to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but the Trump administration's decision to complement Israel's attacks effectively closed this gap. The result is that Washington now "owns" the policy of prevention. Further U.S. military action may be required to convince Tehran that a diplomatic agreement will safeguard its regime more than a swift breakout toward a nuclear weapon would. The writer is executive director of The Washington Institute. 2025-07-03 00:00:00Full Article
The Attack on Iran Is a Watershed for U.S. Policy
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Robert Satloff - Iran's direct missile and drone attacks on Israel in 2024 represented a major strategic blunder for Iran, exposing its national assets and citizens to external attack for the first time since the Iran-Iraq War. The recent attack on Iran is a watershed for U.S. policy, redefining red lines for potential U.S. military action. Previously, there was friction between the U.S. and Israel over their respective thresholds for military operations to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, but the Trump administration's decision to complement Israel's attacks effectively closed this gap. The result is that Washington now "owns" the policy of prevention. Further U.S. military action may be required to convince Tehran that a diplomatic agreement will safeguard its regime more than a swift breakout toward a nuclear weapon would. The writer is executive director of The Washington Institute. 2025-07-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|