Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Affairs) Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar - Israel's June 13 assault on Iran is one of the worst setbacks the Islamic Republic has ever experienced. Iran's national security strategy remains broadly unchanged. The Islamic Republic may be weaker in some ways, but its leaders are proud of having withstood the Israeli and American assaults. They see the substantial damage they inflicted on Israel's cities as a major achievement. And they continue to believe that demonstrating resolve in the face of aggression is the only way to deter their opponents. Iranian leaders will thus set out to rebuild the country's network of proxies: the axis of resistance. They will trust diplomacy even less than before. Instead, they will lay the groundwork for a long war of attrition with Israel - and a potential nuclear breakout. The Iranian government is likely to use the ceasefire respite to accelerate its militarization in preparation for sustained conflict, channeling resources into the IRGC and other armed forces and security agencies. But it will struggle to prove that it can handle another war, especially given the extent to which its ranks have been penetrated by Israeli intelligence operatives. Critics have accused the regime of prioritizing ideological loyalty over competence, allowing individuals who simply mouthed hardline slogans to rise through the ranks while concealing their true allegiances. There have been calls for investigations, accountability, and even the resignation of senior officials accused of overseeing the catastrophic intelligence failure. While some commentators see Iran's aggressive Middle East strategy as a failure, given the collapse of Hizbullah in Lebanon, Assad in Syria, and Hamas in Gaza - plus the damage to Iran's own military - the IRGC sees the situation differently. Its leaders believe the country's forward defense strategy has been vindicated. This approach successfully deterred Israel and the U.S. from attacking for years and bought Tehran critical time to build up the industrial infrastructure, technical expertise, and institutional resilience it can now use to rapidly rebuild its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The writer is Associate Professor of International Affairs at Texas A&M University. 2025-07-08 00:00:00Full Article
Iran to Lay the Groundwork for a Long War of Attrition with Israel
(Foreign Affairs) Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar - Israel's June 13 assault on Iran is one of the worst setbacks the Islamic Republic has ever experienced. Iran's national security strategy remains broadly unchanged. The Islamic Republic may be weaker in some ways, but its leaders are proud of having withstood the Israeli and American assaults. They see the substantial damage they inflicted on Israel's cities as a major achievement. And they continue to believe that demonstrating resolve in the face of aggression is the only way to deter their opponents. Iranian leaders will thus set out to rebuild the country's network of proxies: the axis of resistance. They will trust diplomacy even less than before. Instead, they will lay the groundwork for a long war of attrition with Israel - and a potential nuclear breakout. The Iranian government is likely to use the ceasefire respite to accelerate its militarization in preparation for sustained conflict, channeling resources into the IRGC and other armed forces and security agencies. But it will struggle to prove that it can handle another war, especially given the extent to which its ranks have been penetrated by Israeli intelligence operatives. Critics have accused the regime of prioritizing ideological loyalty over competence, allowing individuals who simply mouthed hardline slogans to rise through the ranks while concealing their true allegiances. There have been calls for investigations, accountability, and even the resignation of senior officials accused of overseeing the catastrophic intelligence failure. While some commentators see Iran's aggressive Middle East strategy as a failure, given the collapse of Hizbullah in Lebanon, Assad in Syria, and Hamas in Gaza - plus the damage to Iran's own military - the IRGC sees the situation differently. Its leaders believe the country's forward defense strategy has been vindicated. This approach successfully deterred Israel and the U.S. from attacking for years and bought Tehran critical time to build up the industrial infrastructure, technical expertise, and institutional resilience it can now use to rapidly rebuild its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The writer is Associate Professor of International Affairs at Texas A&M University. 2025-07-08 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|