Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies) Maj.-Gen. (res.) Tamir Hayman - The campaign against Iran was necessary at this time. The operation's goals were achieved, and in the short term, Israel's security has improved. However, in the long run, the threat has not disappeared. Unless regime change occurs, Iran will likely remain a source of threats to Israel. Post-war Iran is weaker but no less dangerous. Israel must maintain preparedness against the Iranian threat, including intervention capabilities to disrupt any nuclear breakout. At the same time, Israel should not rule out a nuclear agreement between the U.S. and Iran, provided it meets key conditions: No independent Iranian uranium enrichment. Thorough and ongoing international oversight, including weapons components. A binding agreement without an expiration "sunset" clause. The writer, former head of the IDF Intelligence Directorate, is the executive director of INSS. 2025-07-10 00:00:00Full Article
Post-War Iran Remains Dangerous
(Institute for National Security Studies) Maj.-Gen. (res.) Tamir Hayman - The campaign against Iran was necessary at this time. The operation's goals were achieved, and in the short term, Israel's security has improved. However, in the long run, the threat has not disappeared. Unless regime change occurs, Iran will likely remain a source of threats to Israel. Post-war Iran is weaker but no less dangerous. Israel must maintain preparedness against the Iranian threat, including intervention capabilities to disrupt any nuclear breakout. At the same time, Israel should not rule out a nuclear agreement between the U.S. and Iran, provided it meets key conditions: No independent Iranian uranium enrichment. Thorough and ongoing international oversight, including weapons components. A binding agreement without an expiration "sunset" clause. The writer, former head of the IDF Intelligence Directorate, is the executive director of INSS. 2025-07-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|